2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-s1-p330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NineML: the network interchange for ne uroscience modeling language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In NineML the levels of description are not physical scales but are more conceptual, with an abstraction layer and a user layer [108]. …”
Section: Declarative Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NineML the levels of description are not physical scales but are more conceptual, with an abstraction layer and a user layer [108]. …”
Section: Declarative Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NeuroML is a model definition languages that is suitable to describe neuronal network models, providing a description of the underlying physiology (Gleeson et al, 2010). NineML is targeted at the simulator independent description of neuron and synapse models as well as connection routines that may then provide the primitives to define network models in NeuroML (Raikov et al, 2011). These efforts are crucial to facilitate collaborations and sharing of models within the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches are used to simplify the interfaces to existing simulators which offer different trade-offs in the ease of reusability of components, the complexity of the surrounding toolchains, and in the expressiveness and readability of the model specifications. One approach has been to design high-level, declarative languages for expressing the mathematical behaviors of neurons and synapses, for example MODL (Carnevale and Hines, 2006), NDF (Bower and Beeman, 1998), NeuroML/LEMS (Goddard et al, 2001; Gleeson et al, 2010) and NineML (Raikov et al, 2011). These languages are either read natively by the simulator, or intermediate code-generation tools can be used to translate these descriptions to run on existing simulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%