2010
DOI: 10.1177/0042098009360221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nineteen Days in April: Urban Protest and Democracy in Nepal

Abstract: For 19 days in April 2006, Nepal witnessed a popular uprising against the royal-military coup staged by King Gyanendra in February 2005. The Jana Andolan II (People’s Movement II) demanded a return to democracy, the establishment of a lasting peace in Nepal and more political and economic inclusion for the various ethnic and caste groups historically marginalised in Nepali society. Through an analysis of the Jana Andolan (particularly within the urban space of Nepal’s capital, Kathmandu) and the subsequent pea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This intertwinement rests significantly on the fact that Nepal has experienced a dramatic increase in its remittance economy (Government of Nepal, ; Sharma et al, ) that has further stimulated urban growth. Of equal significance for understanding Nepal's urban transformation is the fact that it has taken off in the midst of the armed conflict from 1996 to 2006 (for useful reviews of the conflict, see Adhikari & Gellner, ; Routledge, ; Gellner, ), and, as we shall show, the transformation has been partly driven by it. The historical context and the recent rapid change in both urban growth dynamics and migration patterns provide an opportunity for in situ studies of the concurrent largescale transformation in Nepal and make Nepal a relevant case for understanding the intersection between migration and urbanisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This intertwinement rests significantly on the fact that Nepal has experienced a dramatic increase in its remittance economy (Government of Nepal, ; Sharma et al, ) that has further stimulated urban growth. Of equal significance for understanding Nepal's urban transformation is the fact that it has taken off in the midst of the armed conflict from 1996 to 2006 (for useful reviews of the conflict, see Adhikari & Gellner, ; Routledge, ; Gellner, ), and, as we shall show, the transformation has been partly driven by it. The historical context and the recent rapid change in both urban growth dynamics and migration patterns provide an opportunity for in situ studies of the concurrent largescale transformation in Nepal and make Nepal a relevant case for understanding the intersection between migration and urbanisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The twelve-point understanding signed in November 2005 between the Maoists and the mainstream parliamentary parties of Nepal, who had earlier formed an SPA declared a nineteen day-long Jana Andolan-II, from April 6, 2006to April 24, 2006, leading to the collapse of King Gyanendra's autocracy (Muni 2010: 16). In response, the Ministry of Home Affairs issued a statement on April 5, 2006, alerting the country to the involvement of the terrorist group (i.e., the Maoists) in the anti-people general strike (Routledge 2010(Routledge : 1288(Routledge -1289. Finally, under pressure from all corners including political parties, the Maoists and the civil society, King Gyanendra reinstated government in April 2006.…”
Section: Post Jana Andolan-2006 Situation and The Cpn (Maoist)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in this issue, Allegra et al point out that ‘throughout history, cities have been the theatre of social and spatial struggles’ and that these have long been of interest to urban scholars (see also Routledge, 2010). Yet they argue that rethinking urban protest has not happened alongside the growing interest in rethinking the ‘theoretical and epistemological assumptions’ of urban studies.…”
Section: Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%