2019
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1903076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nintedanib for Systemic Sclerosis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
969
3
54

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,185 publications
(1,062 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
36
969
3
54
Order By: Relevance
“…An aggressive immunosuppression was not able to revert fibrotic lung damage in IPF or SSc however, remaining associated with the known side effects [33]. These patients can benefit from the use of conventional therapy (controlling systemic DA) associated with anti-fibrotic drugs, as recently reported for Nintedanib in SSc [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…An aggressive immunosuppression was not able to revert fibrotic lung damage in IPF or SSc however, remaining associated with the known side effects [33]. These patients can benefit from the use of conventional therapy (controlling systemic DA) associated with anti-fibrotic drugs, as recently reported for Nintedanib in SSc [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…70 Announced earlier this year were the results of the much anticipated SENSCIS trial, a randomised placebo-controlled trial, which assessed nintedanib versus placebo in SSc-ILD over 52 weeks. 71 Whilst a modest reduced rate of annual FVC decline (À52 mL year 1 in nintedanib versus À93.3 mL year 1 in placebo, P = 0.04) was reported in the nintedanib group, there was a high proportion of reported adverse events of which diarrhoea was most common (75.7% in nintedanib group and 31% in placebo respectively). Interestingly, almost 50% of patients were receiving mycophenolate prior to enrolment, challenging discussion as to whether the combination of anti-fibrotic and immunosuppressant therapy is of additional benefit in this cohort.…”
Section: Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Announced earlier this year were the results of the much anticipated SENSCIS trial, a randomised placebo‐controlled trial, which assessed nintedanib versus placebo in SSc‐ILD over 52 weeks . Whilst a modest reduced rate of annual FVC decline (−52 mL year 1 in nintedanib versus −93.3 mL year 1 in placebo, P = 0.04) was reported in the nintedanib group, there was a high proportion of reported adverse events of which diarrhoea was most common (75.7% in nintedanib group and 31% in placebo respectively).…”
Section: Treatment Of Ildmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure , a clinician may consider anti‐fibrotic therapies in patients with progressive ILD or those intolerant of immuno‐modulatory therapy (eg, due to recurrent infections). The SENSCIS trial, a large Phase 3 trial, demonstrated a smaller decline in FVC with the addition of nintedanib (an intracellular multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor) to background MMF or no therapy vs placebo . Based on published data, sequential combination therapy could be considered for patients with high risk of progression (not addressed in the SENSCIS trail), where progression has occurred under monotherapy, or contraindication to the immunosuppressive therapy.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%