Nipple Reconstruction on Implant-Only Breast Mounds: The Use of a Delay

Topol, Bruce M.; Campbell, Connie J.; Dalton, Edward F.; Ponn, Teresa

doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181c2a33f

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

2010

DOI: 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181c2a33f

|View full text |Cite

Nipple Reconstruction on Implant-Only Breast Mounds: The Use of a Delay

Bruce M. Topol

Connie J. Campbell

Edward F. Dalton

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2014

2017

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…10 Esthetic beneÞ ts are also attributed to this procedure. [10][11][12][13] However, a meta-analysis of trials using ADM in breast reconstructions showed a higher rate of infections, seromas, and reconstruction failure but a lower rate of capsular contracture compared with non-ADM reconstructions. 14 One drawback of assessing outcomes and complication rates in breast reconstruction with and without ADM is the lack of randomized, controlled clinical trials.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Breast Reconstruction with or without Human Acellular Dermal Matrices: A Single-Clinic, Review of Esthetic Outcomes and Risk Factors for Complications

Rosenberg¹,

Palaia²,

Cahan³

et al. 2014

Am J Cosmet Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy using human acellular dermal matrix (HADM) offers clinical benefits over reconstruction without HADM. However, guidance on HADM use, questions regarding complications, and lack of outcomes and comparison data remain. In this retrospective chart review, clinical outcomes following breast reconstruction with or without HADM and by HADM type are evaluated to address these issues. Materials and Methods: Charts for all patients undergoing breast reconstruction at a single clinic from 2006 to 2011 were collected. Information extracted included baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics, comorbidities, medications, type of HADM in breast reconstruction (FlexHD, AlloDerm, or no HADM), clinical outcomes, and esthetic results. Variables with significant group differences were risk-adjusted in multivariate analyses for postoperative and aesthetic outcomes. Results: A total of 650 patient charts (881 breast reconstructions) were analyzed, with few differences in patient/clinical characteristics between the HADM and no-HADM groups. The most commonly reported clinical complications in all groups were seroma and infections. The AlloDerm group had an increased adjusted risk of complications compared with the no HADM group; the FlexHD group had no significant differences compared with the no-HADM group. Both FlexHD and AlloDerm groups exhibited significantly higher perceived esthetic results compared with the no-HADM group (8.22 and 8.02 vs 6.53, respectively, P < .0001). Conclusions: These results suggest that the enhanced esthetic outcomes with HADM and expanders/implants in breast reconstruction may outweigh the risk of certain surgical complications, especially with FlexHD. Appropriate patient selection based on complication risk factors may further increase the benefit-to-risk ratio for HADM use in breast reconstructions.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Breast Reconstruction with or without Human Acellular Dermal Matrices: A Single-Clinic, Review of Esthetic Outcomes and Risk Factors for Complications

Rosenberg¹,

Palaia²,

Cahan³

et al. 2014

Am J Cosmet Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Modified S-Flap for Nipple Reconstruction

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Nipple Reconstruction on Implant-Only Breast Mounds: The Use of a Delay

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Breast Reconstruction with or without Human Acellular Dermal Matrices: A Single-Clinic, Review of Esthetic Outcomes and Risk Factors for Complications

Breast Reconstruction with or without Human Acellular Dermal Matrices: A Single-Clinic, Review of Esthetic Outcomes and Risk Factors for Complications

Modified S-Flap for Nipple Reconstruction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About