2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-008-0546-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NIST–NRC Comparison of Total Immersion Liquid-in-Glass Thermometers

Abstract: The use of liquid-in-glass (LIG) thermometers is described in many documentary standards in the fields of environmental testing, material testing, and material transfer. Many national metrology institutes, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Research Council of Canada (NRC), list calibration services for these thermometers among the Calibration Measurement Capabilities of Appendix C of the BIPM Key Comparison Database. NIST and NRC arranged a bilateral compariso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to year 2000, LiG thermometer calibrations at NIST employed visualization by eye, which is the standard method used to obtain LiG thermometer readings at meteorological stations. The uncertainty attending a LiG thermometer reading taken by eye (visual repeatability) is 1/4 of a scale division [101,105]. For a calibrated 1 • C/division mercury or alcohol (spirit) meteorological LiG thermometer, the true air temperature is taken to be somewhere within ±0.125 • C of the measurement as read by eye.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to year 2000, LiG thermometer calibrations at NIST employed visualization by eye, which is the standard method used to obtain LiG thermometer readings at meteorological stations. The uncertainty attending a LiG thermometer reading taken by eye (visual repeatability) is 1/4 of a scale division [101,105]. For a calibrated 1 • C/division mercury or alcohol (spirit) meteorological LiG thermometer, the true air temperature is taken to be somewhere within ±0.125 • C of the measurement as read by eye.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%