2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate-reducing bacterial community in a biofilm-electrode reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The enrichment of Gammaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Firmicutes has been detected in previous studies characterizing denitrification from waste treatment systems (Knowles, 1982). More significantly, the dominance of the Proteobacteria in five of the six non-loop reactors is consistent with identification in the two previously reported nonloop denitrifying biocathode studies (Park et al, 2006;. Although 16S rRNA does not indicate physiological function, the congruence between multiple community data sets from different inoculum, sampling regimes and reactor designs suggests a functional role for members of the Gammaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria in cathodic denitrifying biofilms.…”
Section: Identification Of Bacteria Most Active In Denitrifying Biofilmssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The enrichment of Gammaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Firmicutes has been detected in previous studies characterizing denitrification from waste treatment systems (Knowles, 1982). More significantly, the dominance of the Proteobacteria in five of the six non-loop reactors is consistent with identification in the two previously reported nonloop denitrifying biocathode studies (Park et al, 2006;. Although 16S rRNA does not indicate physiological function, the congruence between multiple community data sets from different inoculum, sampling regimes and reactor designs suggests a functional role for members of the Gammaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria in cathodic denitrifying biofilms.…”
Section: Identification Of Bacteria Most Active In Denitrifying Biofilmssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Although we restricted our analysis to only the most active community members (16S rRNA) and previous studies relied on persistent and active members (16S rRNA gene), the use of the PhyloChip uncovered significantly greater numbers of OTUs than was reported in previous BES studies. In comparison to the richness described here (Figure 6, x axis), only four dominant DGGE bands (Park et al, 2006) or two dominant genera (Gregory and et al, 2004) were identified in other studies. Reasons for this discrepancy probably have less to do with vast differences in community richness associated with our reactors, but are more likely attributed to the limitation of the technique (DGGE) or small sampling regimes (o90 clones) that failed to capture a large fraction of the biofilm bacterial diversity.…”
Section: Lack Of Relationship Between Dominant Members and Reactor Pementioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations