2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-004-4318-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate removal in a first-order stream: reconciling laboratory and field measurements

Abstract: Abstract. A combination of laboratory and field experiments were carried out to evaluate nitrate(NO This apparent disparity between simulated laboratory and insitu stream removal rates appears to be a function of the hydrological processes controlling exchanges between stream bottom sediments and the overlying water. These results suggest that caution must be exercised in extrapolating potentials for NO À 3 removal measured in laboratory experiments to the field, as these rates could be overestimated in some w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since NO 3 − saturation of denitrification has been shown in other agriculturally influenced streams (Royer et al, 2004; Bernot and Dodds, 2005), it was important to determine the potential for increased water column NO 3 − to stimulate denitrification rates in the stream in this study. Nitrate concentrations in the unamended controls in the NO 3 − addition experiment were typical of baseflow conditions in the OGF drainage network (Thompson et al, 2000; Poe et al, 2004; Ensign et al, 2006) and were relatively low compared to other agricultural streams (Kellman, 2004; Royer et al, 2004). Streamflow in this coastal agricultural watershed was dominated by low NO 3 − during baseflow with pulses of NO 3 − observed during storm events (Ensign et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since NO 3 − saturation of denitrification has been shown in other agriculturally influenced streams (Royer et al, 2004; Bernot and Dodds, 2005), it was important to determine the potential for increased water column NO 3 − to stimulate denitrification rates in the stream in this study. Nitrate concentrations in the unamended controls in the NO 3 − addition experiment were typical of baseflow conditions in the OGF drainage network (Thompson et al, 2000; Poe et al, 2004; Ensign et al, 2006) and were relatively low compared to other agricultural streams (Kellman, 2004; Royer et al, 2004). Streamflow in this coastal agricultural watershed was dominated by low NO 3 − during baseflow with pulses of NO 3 − observed during storm events (Ensign et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Clearly the presence of debris dams in some of our suburban streams is not sufficient to consume all anthropogenic NO 3 − in these streams. However, without the heterogeneity in flow and C and N dynamics caused by the presence of these dams, NO 3 − concentrations in these streams would likely be higher (Fisher et al, 2004; Gücker and Boëchat, 2004; Kellman, 2004). Whole‐stream manipulations of debris dams are needed to truly quantify their importance as regulators of stream NO 3 − levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in denitrification potential in debris dam samples from the forested reference stream that were amended with 2 mg NO 3 − –N L −1 confirms that this “urban effect” on denitrification is due to the high NO 3 − concentrations in urban and suburban streams. Many studies have found that denitrification in organic‐rich, anaerobic sites such as organic debris dams is NO 3 − –limited and therefore increases with increasing NO 3 − concentrations (Holmes et al, 1996; Martin et al, 2001; Kemp and Dodds, 2002; Kellman, 2004; Richardson et al, 2004; Wall et al, 2005; Tuerk and Aelion, 2005). These results suggest that high denitrification potential in debris dams rich in organic matter may play an important role in maintaining water quality by reducing NO 3 − loading to receiving waters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, laboratory experiments using intact stream sediment cores found denitrification rates of 100À400 mg N m À2 d À1 , whereas studies completed at the reach scale detected no denitrification once dilution of the stream by groundwater was taken into account. 29 The primary objective of this study was to link the spatial and temporal dynamics of fluid flow and denitrification. We accomplished this goal by combining pore-fluid nitrate concentration and isotopic data with point-specific infiltration rates.…”
Section: ' Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%