This report contains the chemistry of the ruthenium−carbene functionality bonded to the
dibenzotetramethyltetraaza[14]annulene dianion, tmtaa. [{Ru(tmtaa)}2(μ-C8H12)], 1, was the
most appropriate starting material, as it contains a labile olefin, which can be displaced by
a number of ligands to give [Ru(tmtaa)(L)(L‘)] [L = L‘ = Py, 2; L = CO, L‘ = thf, 3; L =
ButNC, L‘ = thf, 4; L = L‘ = ButNC, 5]. Reaction of 1 with diazoalkanes led to the
displacement of the olefin and gave the corresponding carbene derivatives [Ru(tmtaa)(CRR‘)]
[R = R‘ = Ph, 6; R = Ph, R‘ = H, 7; R = Ph, R‘ = COOMe, 8], which have square-pyramidal
structures. Complexes 7 and 8 underwent a remarkable labilization of the carbene
functionality in the reaction with carbon monoxide, while 6 was only converted to the
corresponding carbonyl [Ru(tmtaa)(CPh2)(CO)], 10, by CO. The reaction of 7 with both CO
and ButNC led to the migration of the carbene to one of the metalladiimino rings of the
ligands in 12 and 13, while the reaction of 8 with both CO and ButNC enabled us to intercept
the preliminary product of a free-radical-type migration of the carbene to the tmtaa ligand,
with the isolation of 11 and 14. The ligand (CO or ButNC)-induced migration of the CR2
fragment to the macrocycle seemed to proceed via a carbene mechanism in the case of 7,
while 8 seemed to prefer a free-radical-like pathway. This assumption was further supported
by extended Hückel calculations and by the reaction of 6−8 with ligands of different σ/π
donor/acceptor capability. The pyridine converted 6−8 to the corresponding coordinate
adducts, 15−17, while the reaction of 7 with PMe3 led to the formation of [Ru(tmtaa)(PMe3)2]
and stilbenes, via a plausible carbene mechanism. The reaction of 8 with PMe3 proceeded
through a free-radical pathway leading to 19, which has a structure similar to 11 and 14.
The ligand-induced labilization of the metallacarbene functionality in the macrocyclic
environment was analyzed using the extended Hückel calculations.