2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2296(07)46001-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric Oxide and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: Common Features Influencing Root Growth and Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, questions arise as to whether increased NO fluxes derived from N fertilization may affect growth and development, influence plant nutrition, and also affect a range of other plant responses (Lamattina et al, 2003). On the other hand, associative or symbiotic relationships between roots and microorganisms may contribute to NO production, and could also influence NO synthesis on each other (Molina-Favero et al, 2007).…”
Section: Nitric Oxide Synthesis In Plant Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, questions arise as to whether increased NO fluxes derived from N fertilization may affect growth and development, influence plant nutrition, and also affect a range of other plant responses (Lamattina et al, 2003). On the other hand, associative or symbiotic relationships between roots and microorganisms may contribute to NO production, and could also influence NO synthesis on each other (Molina-Favero et al, 2007).…”
Section: Nitric Oxide Synthesis In Plant Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitric oxide (NO) produced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which enhance plant growth by direct and indirect mechanisms, is an intermediary in auxin-regulated signaling cascades influencing root growth and developmental processes, namely the induction of adventitious root formation ( Molina-Favero et al, 2007 ). On the other hand, NO is implicated in the virulence of bacterial pathogens, with evidence for the role of microbial generated NO in the activation/deactivation of phytotoxins ( Wach et al, 2005 ) and in the defense against immune oxidative burst.…”
Section: The Dualism Of Nitric Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, NO (and ROS) dualistic nature regards their ability in signaling either the promotion of stress defense or pathogenesis. The NO level is determinant for pathogenesis, an ability for a high NO level synthesis from the pathogen might stimulate disease, whereas a lower level synthesis by a PGPR might be determinant in plant development process, for instance in root growth ( Molina-Favero et al, 2007 ). The importance of the NO level in an evolutionary background is described in the sections below, where possible chronological events leading to the actual intricate NO–ROS interplay and NO signaling are presented.…”
Section: The Dualism Of Nitric Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter can be achieved by multiple possible pathways, such as aerobic denitrification and heterotrophic nitrification. NO is produced during the middle and late logarithmic phases of growth (Molina-Favero et al 2007. The NO production in A. brasilense Sp245 induces morphological changes in tomato roots regardless of the full bacterial capacity to synthesize IAA.…”
Section: Nitric Oxide and Azospirillum Sp Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%