1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1185-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric Oxide Research from Chemistry to Biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ferrous heme–nitrosyl complexes generally have S t = 1/2 ground states, which is evident from their EPR spectra . Early work studying ferrous heme–nitrosyls in both model complexes and proteins like Hb and Mb laid the ground work for characterizing these species, as summarized in Table . ,,,,,, EPR spectra of 5C ls-{FeNO} 7 complexes generally display g values of ∼2.10, 2.06, and 2.01, as shown in Figure , which compares the EPR spectra of the Fe­(II)–NO adduct of sGC and the model complex [Fe­(T o -F 2 PP)­(NO)] . [Fe­(OEP)­(NO)] was investigated using single crystal EPR spectroscopy and it was found that the principal axis of the minimum g value, g min , is closely aligned with the Fe–NO bond and therefore corresponds to g z …”
Section: Nitric Oxide In Mammalian Signaling and Immune Defensementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ferrous heme–nitrosyl complexes generally have S t = 1/2 ground states, which is evident from their EPR spectra . Early work studying ferrous heme–nitrosyls in both model complexes and proteins like Hb and Mb laid the ground work for characterizing these species, as summarized in Table . ,,,,,, EPR spectra of 5C ls-{FeNO} 7 complexes generally display g values of ∼2.10, 2.06, and 2.01, as shown in Figure , which compares the EPR spectra of the Fe­(II)–NO adduct of sGC and the model complex [Fe­(T o -F 2 PP)­(NO)] . [Fe­(OEP)­(NO)] was investigated using single crystal EPR spectroscopy and it was found that the principal axis of the minimum g value, g min , is closely aligned with the Fe–NO bond and therefore corresponds to g z …”
Section: Nitric Oxide In Mammalian Signaling and Immune Defensementioning
confidence: 91%
“…acid (Beligni et al, 2002). This reaction may occur under microlocalized pH conditions in the chloroplast and apoplastic space, where ascorbic acid is known to be present (Henry et al, 1997).…”
Section: Common Sites Of Ros and No Production Within Plant Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P450s) to oxidatively convert l -arginine to citrulline and NO. The NO produced in this way in neurons and the endothelium is then sensed by the enzyme soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), which uses a heme as the primary NO-sensor unit. Similar sensor domains, termed H-NOX, are also found in bacteria as gas sensors (primarily for O 2 and NO). In bacteria, NO is produced by bacterial NOS, and the NO generated in this way is then involved in quorum sensing and potentially biosynthesis . In humans, NO is further degraded in blood by reaction with oxy-hemoglobin (by oxidation to nitrate), to avoid accumulation of this toxic molecule. Other important heme proteins involved in the biological functions of NO are nitrophorins (NO transporters in the saliva of blood-sucking insects), , and heme-based nitrite and NO reductases (NIRs and NORs), responsible for the production and detoxification of NO in denitrification. Heme-NO adducts are further important intermediates in a number of key reactions in the nitrogen cycle. Correspondingly, much research has been directed toward the interaction of NO with hemes, in proteins and model systems, and the study of the geometric and electronic structures as well as the reactivity of these species in different oxidation states. ,− Initially, studies focused on ferrous heme-nitrosyls, or {FeNO} 7 complexes in the Enemark–Feltham notation, as models for the corresponding O 2 adducts of heme proteins. Later, these {FeNO} 7 complexes turned out to be the relevant species involved in NO-based signaling. , In the Enemark–Feltham notation, the exponent “7” corresponds to the number of valence electrons of the complex, which is the sum of Fe­(d) and NO­(π*) electrons (here: 6 for Fe­(II) plus 1 for NO = 7). This notation is useful, because NO is a “noninnocent” or redox-active ligand, , and hence, it is a priori not clear what the electron distribution in a given transition metal-NO complex is.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%