2009
DOI: 10.1139/w08-124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrifier and denitrifier molecular operational taxonomic unit compositions from sites of a freshwater estuary of Chesapeake Bay

Abstract: Temporal and spatial changes in the molecular operational taxonomic unit (OTU) compositions of bacteria harboring genes for nitrification and denitrification were assessed using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), clone-based DNA sequencing of selected PCR products, and analyses of ammonium and organic matter concentrations. Sediment, overlying water, and pore-water samples were taken from different vegetated sites of Jug Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Maryland, during spring, summer, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results on uncoupling of the nirK-community structure and denitrification activity both within ) and among lakes suggest that denitrification is controlled by environmental factors rather than by the structure of the nirK community. In addition, the nirK community was seasonally very stable, despite clear seasonality in environmental factors, which contrasts with previous studies of nirK communities in aquatic sediments (Fortunato et al 2009) and agricultural land (Wolsing & PriemĂ© 2004, Wertz et al 2009) and with the nosZ communities in sediments (Scala & Kerkhof 2000, MagalhĂŁes et al 2008. However, the result is consistent with the study of Desnues et al (2007) in a hypersaline microbial mat.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…However, our results on uncoupling of the nirK-community structure and denitrification activity both within ) and among lakes suggest that denitrification is controlled by environmental factors rather than by the structure of the nirK community. In addition, the nirK community was seasonally very stable, despite clear seasonality in environmental factors, which contrasts with previous studies of nirK communities in aquatic sediments (Fortunato et al 2009) and agricultural land (Wolsing & PriemĂ© 2004, Wertz et al 2009) and with the nosZ communities in sediments (Scala & Kerkhof 2000, MagalhĂŁes et al 2008. However, the result is consistent with the study of Desnues et al (2007) in a hypersaline microbial mat.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…The cluster III contained 16 OTUs and 66,761 sequences with 24.0% from PS, 49.8% from SS, and 26.2% from AL, whereas the cluster IV contained 13 OTUs and 42,125 sequences with 8.7% from PS, 39.2% from SS, and 52.1% from AL. These two clusters included 24.7 and 15.6% of total sequences, respectively, and were closely related to those from some lake or estuarine sediments, such as Yangtze lakes (MF776282; KU159621) ( Jiang et al, 2017 ), San Francisco Bay estuary (KR060158; KR060517) ( Lee and Francis, 2017 ), Yellow River Estuary (KF144040; KX952261) ( Li et al, 2014 ), Lake Baikal (MK460630), Chesapeake Bay estuary (EU725900) ( Fortunato et al, 2009 ), and microbial mats on King George Island (KC951296; KC951293; KC951286) ( AlcĂĄntara-HernĂĄndez et al, 2014 ). The cluster V contained one OTU and 53,453 sequences with 75.2% from AL, 24.7% from SS, and 0.1% from PS, and cluster VI also contained one OTU and 1,578 sequences with 88.7% from SS, 10.9% from AL, and 0.4% from PS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Composition was highly variable over seasons and years, and compositional changes in response to the nutrient treatments were minor in comparison. High temporal variability in AOB communities (both abundance and composition) has been observed in both soils and the water column (Gray et al, 2003;O'Mullan and Ward, 2005) and in estuarine sediments (Bernhard et al, 2007;Ando et al, 2009;Fortunato et al, 2009). Given the importance of temperature on the spatial variability of AOB in soils (Fierer et al, 2009), we speculate that temperature could be one important factor contributing to this temporal variability.…”
Section: Temporal Variability and Nutrient Responsesmentioning
confidence: 89%