“…To compare H 2 O 2 selectivity and catalytic activity, the performance of previously reported electrocatalysts is summarized in Figure 3E,F. In the range of 0.45–0.75 V versus RHE (Figure 3E), the BN‐C‐1 exhibits 86%–95% H 2 O 2 selectivity, significantly superior to most of the reported electrocatalysts including atomic‐level tuning Co–N–C catalysts, (Co–N–C, below 80% selectivity 3 ), Fe atomically dispersed on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) (Fe–C–O, ~80%–92% selectivity 36 ), atomic Co dispersed on N‐doped carbon (Co–N x –C, ~75%–85% selectivity 37 ), boron nitride island‐doped carbon (BN–C, ~82%–87% selectivity 12 ), oxidized CNTs (O–CNTs, ~90% selectivity 9 ), B‐rich borocarbonitride (BCN, ~70% selectivity 38 ), B, N‐codoped carbon (B,N–C, ~80%–95% selectivity 39 ), oxygenated boron‐doped carbon (O–BC, ~80%–96% selectivity 40 ), and N, O codoped carbon (NO–C, ~80% selectivity 41 ). Although many electrocatalysts have higher H 2 O 2 selectivity, their E onset , including edge‐rich carbon materials (edge‐rich carbon, ~91%–94%, E onset ≈ 0.70 V 35 ) and single Mo atoms on O, S co‐doped carbon (Mo–OS–C, over 95%, E onset ≈ 0.73 V 5 ), is lower than those of our BN‐C‐1 (86%‐95%, E onset ≈ 0.79 V), as shown in Figure 3F.…”