1996
DOI: 10.2307/2404751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycling in Grazed and Ungrazed Plots in a Temperate Subhumid Grassland in Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
83
3
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
14
83
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of higher foliar P in grazed plots is similar to patterns found by Turner et al (1993) in Kansas where herbivores were excluded for 10 years and Chaneton et al (1996) in temperate subhumid grassland in Argentina where herbivores were excluded for eight years. The light grazing intensity employed in this study site does not change the grass species composition.…”
Section: Grazing Effects On Soil and Plant Nutrients And Aboveground supporting
confidence: 79%
“…The observation of higher foliar P in grazed plots is similar to patterns found by Turner et al (1993) in Kansas where herbivores were excluded for 10 years and Chaneton et al (1996) in temperate subhumid grassland in Argentina where herbivores were excluded for eight years. The light grazing intensity employed in this study site does not change the grass species composition.…”
Section: Grazing Effects On Soil and Plant Nutrients And Aboveground supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Moreover, greater availability of labile N in the soil on higher grazing intensity sites could increase plant uptake rate of N [30,35]. In addition, a higher root biomass by increasing grazing intensity was contribution to plant N uptake [36]. Although high N storage in belowground biomass is common in grasslands [37], the effects of grazing intensity on this pattern were different (i.e., HG amplified this pattern compared to MG and LG).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the reported studies, differences in the response of C and N to grazing are the result of differences in climate, soil properties, community composition, and grazing management practices. Thus, livestock grazing can affect the soil C and N dynamics and storage (Chaneton et al, 1996;Gao et al, 2009). Although inconsistencies in grassland C and N responses to grazing have been reported, several general impacts of grazing on grassland C and N can be identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%