2007
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer and Residual Response in Cotton–Sorghum and Cotton–Cotton Sequences

Abstract: Nitrogen and P fertilizer response for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in a reduced tillage rotation system in the Southern High Plains has not been well studied. During 2000 to 2003, an irrigated study of cotton–sorghum rotation vs. continuous cotton evaluated the crop rotation effects on cotton lint yield and assessed N and P fertilizer and residual fertilizer response for the two systems. Preplant soil samples were collected each spring to determine fertilizer rates.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be related to more N removal by grain corn than seed cotton or greater N immobilization for decomposing corn plant residue than cotton. Our results are in agreement with Booker et al (2007), who reported less soil NO 3 –N when cotton followed sorghum than when cotton followed cotton.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This could be related to more N removal by grain corn than seed cotton or greater N immobilization for decomposing corn plant residue than cotton. Our results are in agreement with Booker et al (2007), who reported less soil NO 3 –N when cotton followed sorghum than when cotton followed cotton.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Brown et al (1985) and Touchton et al (1995) reported an increase in N rate requirement for cotton grown after wheat ( Triticum aestivum L). A recent study by Booker et al (2007) supported these previous findings when they observed greater lint yield response to N fertilizer in cotton following sorghum. They attributed this response to lower N available for the subsequent cotton crop, suggesting that it is also important to account for N debits due to N immobilization in residue to refine N fertilization recommendations for crops in rotation systems.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Present knowledge of cotton responses to residual N (Boquet et al, 1995; McConnell et al, 1993) suggest yields should increase following high corn N rates. Although, in the present study, the N fertilizer applied to corn would be expected to provide varying levels of residual N to the following cotton crop, lint yield responses to residual N were complicated by various factors that contributed to inconsistent and smaller yield increases than reported previously (Boquet et al, 1995; Booker et al, 2007). As demonstrated by the yield responses to corn N rate with the very low rates of fertilizer N (0 and 28 kg ha −1 ), residual N increased cotton lint yield by about 340 kg ha −1 on Commerce SL and 160 kg ha −1 on Gigger SL (Table 5), which are substantial yield responses to corn N rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a very low soil-P vertisol in India, first-year fertilization increased sorghum yield from near zero grain to 3.5 Mg ha −1 with P rates increasing from none to 40 kg P ha −1 and the residual carried over to following years (Sahrawat et al, 1995). Booker et al (2007) also found that residual P fertilizer could result in a grain sorghum yield increase compared with zero P applications, even with no response to direct P fertilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%