their poor efficiency in providing areal capacity compels them to be expanded in surface coverage to fulfill a given demand. This distinct contradiction rules out their possibilities to meet the rigorous energy requirements from future electronics. To resolve this issue, the idea of architecting 3D electrodes exploring the benefits along the neglected height direction to increase loading density while conserving footprints, has seen great success and been well-received. [7,8] Conventional methods reported to realize customized 3D geometries in energy devices include transfer print, template assisted structuring, holographic lithography, etc. [9-11] However, the measures either suffer from poor shape retention, or complicated, costly, and timeconsuming procedures. The advent of 3D printing, an additive rapid prototyping technique, able to tailor arbitrary 3D structures on demand in a facile, consistent and rapid manner has attracted considerable attention for the design of supercapacitors [12,13] Among various printing options, direct ink writing (DIW) based on pneumatic extrusion of non-Newtonian inks boasts the advantage of a high content of active materials and desirable freedom in material selection. Therefore, it has been rated the most suitable 3D printing technique for the fabrication of high-performance functional devices. [14-16] Despite that the loading densities and the corresponding energy density of 3D printed devices have shown undeniable superiority to the thin-film counterparts, simple accumulation of masses via layer-by-layer printing creates a matrix wherein the electrolyte travels in a tortuous manner along complicated routes to accomplish charge adsorption/separation. This inevitably incurs sluggish kinetics and significantly degraded rate performance in short reaction timescales, hence severely shackling the practicality and potential of high energy density devices. [17] In addition, imparting structure robustness and mechanical compliance to 3D printed devices is another aspect of pivotal significance to ensure real-world usability, durability, and safety of devices. This desired attribute also enables the potential to be integrated with flexible electronics for 3D printed energy storage devices. [18] Unluckily, the intrinsic fragility of the usually adopted carbonaceous ink elements and their weak supramolecular interaction pose great challenges for 3D printed energy storage devices to realize the much-anticipated flexible feature.