2003
DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0391:nedami]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen Emissions, Deposition, and Monitoring in the Western United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
324
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
324
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that 50% of all pervious areas are fertilized, 5 this would be the equivalent of 69 to 130 kg N ha −1 y −1 input via fertilization, an order of magnitude larger than estimates of total annual N deposition of <6 to 18 kg/ha. 45,46 As in previous studies, 4,20,47,48 we found that f atm in urban stormwater was high, averaging 34%. The contribution of NO 3 − to total NO 3 − atm export from watersheds ranged from 4 to 53% across all observed events ( Figure 5), and observations of f atm for individual samples within events ranged much more widely (0 to 80% over all samples).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Assuming that 50% of all pervious areas are fertilized, 5 this would be the equivalent of 69 to 130 kg N ha −1 y −1 input via fertilization, an order of magnitude larger than estimates of total annual N deposition of <6 to 18 kg/ha. 45,46 As in previous studies, 4,20,47,48 we found that f atm in urban stormwater was high, averaging 34%. The contribution of NO 3 − to total NO 3 − atm export from watersheds ranged from 4 to 53% across all observed events ( Figure 5), and observations of f atm for individual samples within events ranged much more widely (0 to 80% over all samples).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…-N; the NO 3 --N data were not affected. N dry , which is usually the largest component of N deposition in California and could be 10 times higher than N wet (Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996;Fenn et al 2003), was not directly measured in our study. According to Fenn et al (2010), the atmospheric dry deposition in central Orange County ranged from 9 to 15 kg N ha -1 year -1 , so we applied a value of 12 kg N ha -1 year -1 for our N budgets.…”
Section: N Inputs From Atmospheric Deposition and Irrigation Watermentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The post-1950 increase in emissions of available reactive nitrogen to the atmosphere, specifically ammonia and nitrogen oxides, is a major disruption of the global nitrogen cycle (Smil, 2000, Galloway et al, 1995, Vitousek et al, 1997. Current values in the western United States are at least an order of magnitude greater than background deposition values (Fenn et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Nonlinear Responses In Rocky Mountain Aquatic Ecosystems To mentioning
confidence: 99%