1980
DOI: 10.1021/es60163a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) (= nitrogen oxide (NO) + nitrogen dioxide) monitor based on an hydrogen-atom direct chemiluminescence method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It instead relies on the reaction of NO and NO 2 with H 2 that has been generated through electrical discharge. 9 It is likely that interference and mechanical complexity caused this technique to fail in commercial applications. Yet another approach involves IR absorbance.…”
Section: Historical Background and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It instead relies on the reaction of NO and NO 2 with H 2 that has been generated through electrical discharge. 9 It is likely that interference and mechanical complexity caused this technique to fail in commercial applications. Yet another approach involves IR absorbance.…”
Section: Historical Background and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16b) also holds, the low-pressure limit is identical to Eq. (17). Thus the plug-flow and exponential dilution curves differ in Figs.…”
Section: Plug-flow Reactormentioning
confidence: 88%
“…If interfering chemiluminescence is produced by the reaction of the reagent R with molecules other than D in the sample, then it is possible to discriminate against this unwanted CL if the producing reaction is slow kinetically. Equation (17) indicates that at low [M] the response is proportional to k E, so a low concentration of a reactive species may be detected even in the presence of a higher concentration of another, more slowly reacting species. The ability to discriminate against a slow reaction is shown by the twoheaded arrow in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation