1943
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-194301000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Inter-Relationships in Young Peach and Apple Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1946
1946
1967
1967

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, .at a given nitrate level, a decrease in the phosphate concentration induced a more normal pbnt metabolism. T he reciprocal relationship between nitrogen and phosphorus in plant nutrition has been pointed out by other investigators (3,6,8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In general, .at a given nitrate level, a decrease in the phosphate concentration induced a more normal pbnt metabolism. T he reciprocal relationship between nitrogen and phosphorus in plant nutrition has been pointed out by other investigators (3,6,8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Values higher than this are usually not achieved simply by increasing phosphorus supply (Chapman and Rayner, 1951), but presumably result from metabolic influences on phosphorus retention by the plant. Similar effects on leaf phosphorus concentrations have been shown to result from deficiencies of nitrogen (Chapman and Liebig, Jr., 1940;Cullinan and Batjer, 1943;Mc-Calla and Woodford, 1938), sulfur (Chapman and Brown, 1941), and zinc (Haas, 1936;Kelley and Cummins, 1920;Reed, 1946).…”
Section: Iron Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…For the analysis of other constituents of the leaves and for all constituents of the composite samples, dried material was employed. Five-hundred-milligram portions of dried, finely ground material from the composite or leaf samples were weighed into porcelain capsules, moistened with sulphuric acid (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10), dried at 1050 C. and ashed at 600°C. for 16 hours.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All plants were harvested between 8: 00 a.m. and 11: 00 a.m. except in the case of the second block at the first harvest. This block was harvested between 1: 00 p.m. and 3: 00 p.m. on February 6. At each harvest the plants from one half the crocks in each plot were removed, (i.e., 45 plants per treatment) so the randomized arrangement was maintained.…”
Section: Culture Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%