2005
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen removal from piggery waste using the combined SHARON and ANAMMOX process

Abstract: Nitrogen removal in piggery waste was investigated with the combined SHARON-ANAMMOX process. The piggery waste was characterized as strong nitrogenous wastewater with very low C/N ratio. For the preceding SHARON reactor, ammonium nitrogen loading and conversion rates were 0.97 kg NH4-N/m3 reactor/day and 0.73 kg NH4-N/m3 reactor/day, respectively. Alkalinity consumption for ammonium conversion was 8.5 gr bicarbonate utilized per gram ammonium nitrogen converted to NO2-N or NO3-N at steady-states operation. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Partial nitritation systems were developed by the Delft University of Technology in 1996-1999 [11] and have several advantages over total nitritation-based technologies, such as 25% savings in aeration, 30% reduction of biomass generation, with a biomass yield of about 0.15 g biomass (g NH 4 + -N) −1 [12], and 20% less CO 2 emission [11]. Partial nitritation bioreactors at the laboratory scale have been reported to successfully treat food processing and agriculture industry wastewater, reject wastewater and slaughterhouse wastewater or swine manure wastewater, among others [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Within a partial nitritation reactor, the main performance is the oxidation of ammonium to nitrite, and therefore, there is an accumulation of nitrite in the system.…”
Section: -80mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial nitritation systems were developed by the Delft University of Technology in 1996-1999 [11] and have several advantages over total nitritation-based technologies, such as 25% savings in aeration, 30% reduction of biomass generation, with a biomass yield of about 0.15 g biomass (g NH 4 + -N) −1 [12], and 20% less CO 2 emission [11]. Partial nitritation bioreactors at the laboratory scale have been reported to successfully treat food processing and agriculture industry wastewater, reject wastewater and slaughterhouse wastewater or swine manure wastewater, among others [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Within a partial nitritation reactor, the main performance is the oxidation of ammonium to nitrite, and therefore, there is an accumulation of nitrite in the system.…”
Section: -80mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Kim, 2004). This was closely related to the relatively higher COD (chemical oxygen demand) of 600~25 700 mg/L (Ahn and Kim 2004;Hwang et al, 2005). The COD was 800~1 800 mg/L in sludge digest liquids (Hellinga et al, 1998;Ahn and Choi, 2006).…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, wastewaters from anaerobic treatment of animal waste were also tested (Ahn and Kim, 2004;Hwang et al, 2005;Waki et al, 2007). These wastewaters are known for high organic nitrogen content.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New options for nitrogen removal are based on the so-called anammox, the combination of partial nitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Hwang et al, 2005), but they are still under development.…”
Section: The Problem Of Animal Wastementioning
confidence: 99%