1973
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500030026x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen Requirements of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.) Varieties ‘Blueboy’ and ‘Redcoat’1

Abstract: In 1970–71, five N‐rate field experiments were conducted with fall‐seeded soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.) on limestone‐derived soils in Pennsylvania. Varieties ‘Blueboy’ and ‘Redcoat’ were compared at two locations. At three locations, only Blueboy was grown. Redcoat is widely grown in Pennsylvania, but Blueboy was only recently introduced. The relative nitrogen requirements of these varieties, therefore, was essentially unknown when these studies were begun. Fall and spring applications of 0, 34… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ef value can be expected to range from 0.5 to 0.7, depending on management practices (13), and was previously found to be 0.65 in this area (5). After harvest, the yield response to N can be evaluated by substituting Ymax for YE in Equation [2b1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ef value can be expected to range from 0.5 to 0.7, depending on management practices (13), and was previously found to be 0.65 in this area (5). After harvest, the yield response to N can be evaluated by substituting Ymax for YE in Equation [2b1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Ef can be evaluated by determining total N uptake from about 4 rates of Nf (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 to 2 times the rate needed For optimum production) or by assuming a value between 0.5 to 0.7 (13). When evaluating Ef', the method and time of fertilizer application normally used by the growers should be used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen management in wheat is also important since excess N can reduce yields because lodging and pathogen pressure increase. However, some varieties exhibited a yield reduction as N applications exceeded optimum rates for grain production even before lodging was observed (Stanford and Hunter, 1973). Lower grain yields were also observed when higher than optimum N levels were applied (McDonald, 1992) presumably because N stimulated higher vegetative growth (Schleuber and Tucker, 1967) which did not translate into yield increases.…”
Section: Introduction Grain Yield and Protein Responses To Nitrogen Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower grain yields were also observed when higher than optimum N levels were applied (McDonald, 1992) presumably because N stimulated higher vegetative growth (Schleuber and Tucker, 1967) which did not translate into yield increases. This occurred because the optimum N requirement for maximum straw production is higher than the N requirement for optimum grain yields (Stanford and Hunter, 1973).…”
Section: Introduction Grain Yield and Protein Responses To Nitrogen Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…trait would be useful in selecting genotypes Both fall and winter nitrogen (N) appli-with high yield potential and yield stability, cations can affect wheat yields but results dep-The objective of this study was to evaluate the end on the environment. Generally, when N influence of N fertilizer and application timing availability in the soil was low, grain yields on the importance of the various component increased with N application until yield was traits to determine the variability in grain yield, maximized (STANFORD andHUNTER 1973, grain N yield andN utilization efficiency FREDERICK andMARSHALL 1985, BRUCKNER among four wheat cultivars grown under field and MOREY 1988). The results of split N appli-conditions in a Mediterranean climate, cation are contradictory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%