1996
DOI: 10.1021/es950383e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen Saturation in the Rocky Mountains

Abstract: Nitrogen saturation is occurring throughout high-elevation catchments of the Colorado Front Range. Annual inorganic N loading in wet deposition to the Front Range of ∼4 kg ha-1 yr-1 is about twice that of the Pacific States and similar to many sites in the northeastern United States. In the last ten years at Niwot Ridge/Green Lakes Valley and Glacier Lakes, annual minimum concentrations of NO3 - in surface waters during the growing season have increased from below detection limits to ∼10 μequiv L-1, indicating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
181
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
181
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The catchments of AS lakes have the lowest percentage of meadows (27%) and sparse soils 36±15 kg m -2 , while the catchments of NS and ES have significantly larger amounts of soil (49±13 and 74±24 kg m -2 , respectively; Table 2). The ability of alpine catchments to retain N is positively related to vegetation and amount of soil (e.g., Baron et al 1994;Williams et al 1996;Kopáček et al 2000). The sparse vegetation and low amount of soil thus explain the low terrestrial retention of N in the AS catchments, resulting in the highest NO 3 -(and, consequently, also SSA) concentration in these lakes compared to the other categories (Fig.…”
Section: Lake-to-lake Variations In the Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catchments of AS lakes have the lowest percentage of meadows (27%) and sparse soils 36±15 kg m -2 , while the catchments of NS and ES have significantly larger amounts of soil (49±13 and 74±24 kg m -2 , respectively; Table 2). The ability of alpine catchments to retain N is positively related to vegetation and amount of soil (e.g., Baron et al 1994;Williams et al 1996;Kopáček et al 2000). The sparse vegetation and low amount of soil thus explain the low terrestrial retention of N in the AS catchments, resulting in the highest NO 3 -(and, consequently, also SSA) concentration in these lakes compared to the other categories (Fig.…”
Section: Lake-to-lake Variations In the Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tundra ecosystems have received more research attention (Williams et al, 1996;Bowman et al, 1995;Baron et al, 1994), but much of the research on these ecosystems is in its early stages and comes from very few sites. There is a notable paucity of research evaluating N deposition effects on North American wetlands, although much fine research has been done on European wetlands.…”
Section: Effects On Arid Ecosystems and Other Neglected Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will discuss what we do Nitrogen-saturated terrestrial ecosystems that have been know about these topics and where I perceive the research identified include a number of forest types (Stein and van gaps to be. Breemen, 1993;Peterjohn et al, 1996;, alpine tundra (Baron et al, 1994;Williams et al, 1996), chaparral (Riggan et al, 1994) and riparian wetlands (Han-2. The nitrogen cycle son et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much of the N-saturation research in the United States has been in conifer and hardwood forests of the Northeast (Kahl et al 1993;McNulty and Aber 1993;Rustad et al 1993;Norton et al 1994;Currie 1999;Magill et al 2000), several ecosystems across the United States have been found to be N saturated, including Colorado Rocky Mountain tundra (Baron et al 1994;Williams et al 1996), chaparral and high-elevation sites in southern California (Riggan et al 1985;Fenn et al 1996;Fenn and Poth 1999), hardwood forests of the Catskill Mountains (Lovett et al 2000), and spruce-fir stands of the Northeast (McNulty et al 1996) and Great Smoky Mountains (Johnson et al 1991). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%