1996
DOI: 10.1016/0967-0637(96)00050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen speciation and nitrification potential in the Skagerrak area during the SKAGEX IV experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The annual average content of phosphate 0.11±0.1 µmol l −1 is much lower than that recorded by Abdel-Halim and Khairy (2007) in Eastern Harbor which was 0.51 µmol l −1 . The strongly negative correlations between inorganic phosphate and oxidizable organic matter (r = -0.98) revealed the phosphorous replenishment as a result of microbial decomposition of organic matter (Enoksson et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual average content of phosphate 0.11±0.1 µmol l −1 is much lower than that recorded by Abdel-Halim and Khairy (2007) in Eastern Harbor which was 0.51 µmol l −1 . The strongly negative correlations between inorganic phosphate and oxidizable organic matter (r = -0.98) revealed the phosphorous replenishment as a result of microbial decomposition of organic matter (Enoksson et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…incomplete assimilatory reduction of nitrate by phytoplankton and bacteria (Vaccaro & Ruyther 1960, Wada & Hattori, 1971, Miyazzaki et al 1973, Miyazzaki et al 1975, Kiefer et al 1976, Herbland & Voituriez 1979, Olson 1981a, Dore & Karl, 1996b, Collos 1998. (2) Ammonium oxidation to nitrite by autotrophic nitrifying bacteria (Brandhorst 1959, Miyazzaki et al 1975, Olson 1981a,b, Ward 1986, Dore & Karl 1996b, Enoksson et al 1996. (3) Nitrite assimilation by phytoplankton and bacteria (Ward et al 1989).…”
Section: Abstract: Nutrients · Nitrogen Species · Nitrite · Phytoplamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While samples derived from point sources such as tap water or pore water are relatively straightforward, 84 the sampling of water courses presents a problem in that the nitrite profile will vary considerably with depth and current flow. 33,54,[85][86][87][88] Tidal flushing within deep water will obviously lead to a lower nitrite concentration being recorded than a sample extracted from the upper most layer of a mud sediment where microbial activity will be higher and the immediate water layer less mobile. 34,37 Any aqueous sample must therefore be reconciled with the spatial position, depth and current flow at which it was collected.…”
Section: Sampling Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional factors such as temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH and date/period of sampling will also be required to provide a complete profile of the sample but also to place the nitrite concentration within context. 33,[85][86][87][88] It may well be that high concentrations of nitrite are the result of seasonal fluctuations (increased temperature and light) rather than from anthropogenic sources. 34,87…”
Section: Sampling Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%