1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-9441(86)80001-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitroprusside infusion does not improve biventricular performance in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2) two distinct groups of patients can be identified: In the patients who exhibited pathologically low RVEF values in the control period (RVEF < 45%) [5] the raean increase in RVEF was 6.8%. This number exceeds the limit which is considered to be a significant response to RVEF to a therapeutic intervention for both the thermodilution [18] and radionuclide techniques [7]. In contrast the response in the four patients with normal baseline RVEF values was a mean change of RVEF of 1.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) two distinct groups of patients can be identified: In the patients who exhibited pathologically low RVEF values in the control period (RVEF < 45%) [5] the raean increase in RVEF was 6.8%. This number exceeds the limit which is considered to be a significant response to RVEF to a therapeutic intervention for both the thermodilution [18] and radionuclide techniques [7]. In contrast the response in the four patients with normal baseline RVEF values was a mean change of RVEF of 1.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…As unloading the right ventricle might improve RV function [5] vasodilator treatment of PH has been advocated. Infusing prostaglandin E 1 [6] or conventional vasodilators such as sodium nitroprusside [7], however, has failed to improve global RV function in patients with ARDS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They should also be selective for well-ventilated alveoli as opposed to poorly ventilated alveoli, thereby avoiding increased right-to-left shunt, venous admixture and worsening oxygenation. Several trials of intravenously infused agents (including agents infused directly into the pulmonary artery) have demonstrated that reductions in PAP can only be gained at the expense of systemic hypotension, with the concomitant risks of RV ischaemia and heart failure [69][70][71][72][73][74][75] . Furthermore, increased flow to the areas of poor ventilation induced by systemic vasodilators worsens .…”
Section: Vasodilator Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, several older clinical trials designed to evaluate the effects of intravenous vasodilators [e. g., nitroglycerin [17], nitroprusside [15], diltiazem [16]] found that pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance fall and PaO 2 and systemic O 2 delivery decreased as a result of increased shunt and V A /Q heterogeneity. These deleterious effects were presumed to occur secondary to the inhibition of hypoxic vasocon-943 Fig.…”
Section: Vasodilatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal models the degree of pulmonary hypertension is considerably greater [12] and in the early stages of injury has been attributed to neurohormonal mediators constricting the pulmonary circulation [13]. In humans, it has been difficult to separate vasoconstriction from the effects of PEEP although both seemingly contribute as the degree of pulmonary hypertension changes with titration of PEEP, and intravenous vasodilators reduce pulmonary vascular pressures and improve cardiac output [14,15,27,28]. Unfortunately, this beneficial hemodynamic effect is associated with worsening axygen delivery and increasing shunt (14)(15)(16) attributable to attenuation of hypoxic vasoconstriction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%