1990
DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(90)90092-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrous oxide, nausea, and vomiting after outpatient gynecologic surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Felts et al 2 we were unable to demonstrate that duration of anaesthesia had an effect on post-anaesthesia emesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Similar to Felts et al 2 we were unable to demonstrate that duration of anaesthesia had an effect on post-anaesthesia emesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…While inhalation anesthetics can cause PONV in the early 0-to 2-hour postoperative period, there appears to be no difference in the incidence of PONV risk between desflurane and sevoflurane or between these agents and isoflurane [27,28]. Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) has been shown to increase PONV risk by direct stimulation of the vomiting center and sympathetic nervous system [29][30][31][32]. Peripheral N 2 O stimulation occurs by the distention of air containing spaces of the middle ear, GI tract and gallbladder [33].…”
Section: Anesthesia-related Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The time to loss of consciousness, and desflurane concentration at that time, were greater in the presence of nitrous oxide, despite the higher total MAC fraction administered in that group. Similarly, the incidences of nausea and vomiting, and the requirement for anti-emetics, were higher in group 3 (despite the previously reported emetic effect of nitrous oxide [7], and the fact that this was the only group in which the administration of nitrous oxide was avoided); only the differences in antiemetic dosage reached statistical significance. The possible anti-emetic effect of propofol(81 was not apparent, although the numbers in each group are small, and the possibility of a Type I1 error must be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%