2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nivat’s Conjecture Holds for Sums of Two Periodic Configurations

Abstract: Nivat's conjecture is a long-standing open combinatorial problem. It concerns two-dimensional configurations, that is, maps Z 2 → A where A is a finite set of symbols. Such configurations are often understood as colorings of a two-dimensional square grid. Let Pc(m, n) denote the number of distinct m × n block patterns occurring in a configuration c. Configurations satisfying Pc(m, n) ≤ mn for some m, n ∈ N are said to have low rectangular complexity. Nivat conjectured that such configurations are necessarily p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best general bound was proved in [5] where it was shown that for any rectangle D the condition |L D (c)| ≤ |D|/2 is enough to guarantee that c is periodic. This fact can also be proved using the algebraic approach [14].…”
Section: Nivat's Conjecturementioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best general bound was proved in [5] where it was shown that for any rectangle D the condition |L D (c)| ≤ |D|/2 is enough to guarantee that c is periodic. This fact can also be proved using the algebraic approach [14].…”
Section: Nivat's Conjecturementioning
confidence: 72%
“…If m = 1 then c is periodic, so it is interesting to consider the cases of m ≥ 2. Szabados proved in [14] that Nivat's conjecture holds in the case m = 2. Note that this case is equivalent to c being the sum of two periodic configurations [9].…”
Section: Contributions To Nivat's Conjecturementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the second case we apply the technique by Cyr and Kra [8]. This technique was also used in [17] to address Nivat's conjecture. It is possible to use a direct combination of lemmas from [8] or [17] to prove the following:…”
Section: Periodicity In Low Complexity Subshiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will prove this proposition below using lemmas from [17]. We first recall some definitions, adjusted to our terminology.…”
Section: Periodicity In Low Complexity Subshiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%