2010
DOI: 10.1093/ssjj/jyq020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nizu Chushin no Fukushi Shakai e--Tojisha Shuken no Jisedai Fukushi Senryaku (Towards a Needs-Based Welfare Society--Next Generation Individual Autonomy Welfare Strategies)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his seminal study of Japanese campaigning, Curtis (1971) was one of the first to point to the restrictive character of the election law in explaining Japanese campaign styles, and it may well be because of this explanation that the question of why Japanese election campaigning often seems (and possibly is) ineffective has hardly been pursued any further. Later studies that dealt with electoral campaigning hardly examined the question of micro-level effectiveness but focused on structural adaptation of support organizations (Isao, 1998; Ōtake, 1998; Köllner, 2003), personal cooperation at the district level (Park, 1998, 2000), party cooperation (Christensen, 2000; Johnson, 2000), or the macro-level impact of the new rules that came alongside electoral reform in 1993/94 and made elections more issue-oriented and party-centered (Christensen, 1994; Reed, 1995; Reed and Thies, 2001; Saitō, 1995; Wada, 1996; Yasuoka, 1996; Katō, 1997, 2003; Fukui and Fukai, 1999; McKean and Scheiner, 2000; Krauss and Pekkanen, 2004; Horiuchi, 2005). One exception has been the research of Dabney (2008) who conducted a longitudinal study of campaign strategy change.…”
Section: The Puzzle Of Ineffectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his seminal study of Japanese campaigning, Curtis (1971) was one of the first to point to the restrictive character of the election law in explaining Japanese campaign styles, and it may well be because of this explanation that the question of why Japanese election campaigning often seems (and possibly is) ineffective has hardly been pursued any further. Later studies that dealt with electoral campaigning hardly examined the question of micro-level effectiveness but focused on structural adaptation of support organizations (Isao, 1998; Ōtake, 1998; Köllner, 2003), personal cooperation at the district level (Park, 1998, 2000), party cooperation (Christensen, 2000; Johnson, 2000), or the macro-level impact of the new rules that came alongside electoral reform in 1993/94 and made elections more issue-oriented and party-centered (Christensen, 1994; Reed, 1995; Reed and Thies, 2001; Saitō, 1995; Wada, 1996; Yasuoka, 1996; Katō, 1997, 2003; Fukui and Fukai, 1999; McKean and Scheiner, 2000; Krauss and Pekkanen, 2004; Horiuchi, 2005). One exception has been the research of Dabney (2008) who conducted a longitudinal study of campaign strategy change.…”
Section: The Puzzle Of Ineffectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%