2010
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2010)050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NLO QCD corrections to five-jet production at LEP and the extraction of α s (M Z )

Abstract: Abstract:The highest exclusive jet multiplicity studied at LEP experiments is five. In this paper we compute the next-to-leading order QCD corrections to e + e − annihilation to five jets, essentially closing the (pure) perturbative QCD studies of exclusive jetty final states at LEP. We compare fixed-order perturbative results with ALEPH data. We estimate hadronization corrections to five-jet observables using the event generator SHERPA, which employs the CKKW procedure to combine a reliable perturbative treat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[123,124] it is possible to interface the one-loop calculation with a tool that provides the real emission corrections, the subtraction terms, and can carry out the phase space integration. Such an approach has been used recently to compute the NLO QCD corrections to five jet production in e + e − annihilation where one-loop amplitudes, calculated with generalized unitarity, were interfaced with Madevent/MadFKS [10].…”
Section: Comments On the Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[123,124] it is possible to interface the one-loop calculation with a tool that provides the real emission corrections, the subtraction terms, and can carry out the phase space integration. Such an approach has been used recently to compute the NLO QCD corrections to five jet production in e + e − annihilation where one-loop amplitudes, calculated with generalized unitarity, were interfaced with Madevent/MadFKS [10].…”
Section: Comments On the Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to keep this discussion in line with the main theme of this review, we will assume that the OPP method is employed for the reduction of tensor integrals to the scalar basis, but a Passarino-Veltman reduction could also be used. We note that various implementations of diagrammatic calculations [125,126,10,124] can differ in the details -for example, in how the diagrams are grouped together before the numerical evaluation or in how the rational parts are computed, but are otherwise very similar in spirit.…”
Section: Comments On the Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Examples: pp, pp → W + 3, 4 jets [5,6,7,8], pp, pp → ttbb [9,10], pp → 4b [11], e + e − → 5 jets [12] at NLO QCD; pp, pp → H (with decays) [13,14], Drell-Yan (DY) production of single W or Z bosons (with decays) [15,16], e + e − → 3 jets [17,18] at NNLO QCD; e + e − → 4f [19,20] at NLO EW, • multi-scales: Logarithmic enhanced corrections of the form α k ln n (Q 2 1 /Q 2 2 ), Q 2 1 ≫ Q 2 2 are resummed up to NNLL accuracy. Examples: q T distributions in pp, pp → H [21] and in DY [22]; threshold corrections in top-pair production (for a review see, e. g., [23]); EW Sudakov logarithms in 4-fermion processes (for a review see, e. g., Ref.…”
Section: Why Radiative Corrections ?mentioning
confidence: 99%