2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMDARs contribute to the facial stimuli-evoked mossy fiber-granule cell synaptic transmission in vivo in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies demonstrated that chronic ethanol exposure overdose impairs neuronal function via NMDARs ( Nagy, 2004 ) and that NMDARs contribute to the later components of facial stimulation evoked by MF–GC synaptic transmission in the mouse cerebellar GL ( Zhang et al, 2020 ). We examined the effect of adolescent chronic ethanol exposure on the NMDARs-mediated components of facial stimulation-evoked MF–GC synaptic transmission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies demonstrated that chronic ethanol exposure overdose impairs neuronal function via NMDARs ( Nagy, 2004 ) and that NMDARs contribute to the later components of facial stimulation evoked by MF–GC synaptic transmission in the mouse cerebellar GL ( Zhang et al, 2020 ). We examined the effect of adolescent chronic ethanol exposure on the NMDARs-mediated components of facial stimulation-evoked MF–GC synaptic transmission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined the effect of adolescent chronic ethanol exposure on the NMDARs-mediated components of facial stimulation-evoked MF–GC synaptic transmission. To activate NMDARs in the cerebellar GL during facial stimulation-evoked MF–GC synaptic transmission, we employed a facial stimuli train (20 Hz, five pulses) to evoke five field potential responses (N1–N5) in the cerebellar GL ( Zhang et al, 2020 ). Application of the selective NMDAR antagonist D-APV (250 μM) did not significantly affect the amplitude of N1 but induced a decrease in the amplitudes of N2–N5 in both the control ( P < 0.05 vs. ACSF; Figures 2A,B ) and the chronic ethanol-exposed mice ( P < 0.05 vs. ACSF; Figures 2A,C ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, increased NMDAR-EPSCs facilitated spiking of GluA4-KO GCs during high-frequency synaptic input. Compared with slice recordings, the contribution of NMDARs to GC synaptic excitation is likely to be larger in vivo ( Zhang et al, 2020 ), due to the more depolarized membrane potential and increased spontaneous input in GCs. The larger NMDAR-EPSCs in GluA4-KO are most likely caused by enhanced glutamate release ( Chourbaji et al, 2008 ; Delvendahl et al, 2019 ) that is driven by an increase in the number of presynaptic release sites, but we cannot exclude postsynaptic contributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%