In order to identify agonist-and antagonist-binding epitopes in the human B1 and B2 bradykinin (BK) receptors, we exploited the ability of these receptors to discriminate between peptide ligands that differ only by the absence (B1) and presence (B2) of a C-terminal Arg. This was done by constructing chimeric proteins in which specific domains were exchanged between these receptors as recently described by us (Leeb, T., Mathis, S. A., and LeebLundberg, L. M. Seven-transmembrane domain GPCR 1 constitute by far the largest family of plasma membrane receptors. These receptors bind ligands of widely diverse origins, and are unsurpassed as therapeutic targets. Consequently, much effort has been devoted to mapping of the binding sites for agonist and antagonist ligands in these receptors (1, 2). Even though peptides are the most common class of ligands for GPCR, few peptide GPCR have been investigated thus far, and in most of those cases the identity of the peptide-binding epitopes remains elusive.Receptors for kinins, pro-inflammatory peptides 8 -10 amino acids in length, have been classified into two subtypes, termed B1 and B2 (3), and are members of the GPCR superfamily (4, 5). These receptor subtypes, although only 36% identical, discriminate between peptide agonists that differ only in their C-terminal residue; BK binds to the B2 receptor, whereas the C-terminally truncated carboxypeptidase fragments desArg 9 -BK and des-Arg 10 -Lys-BK, or des-Arg 10 -KD, bind to the B1 receptor. Several high affinity B2 receptor-selective decapeptide antagonists structurally derived from BK have been developed, including NPC17731 and HOE140 (6 -8). Interestingly, the fact that the des-Arg 10 analogs of these peptides act as high affinity B1 receptor-selective antagonists emphasizes the significance of the C-terminal Arg in receptor subtype selectivity (9 -11).In the B2 receptor, extensive analysis of most of the TMs and a significant amount of the ECs by alanine-scanning mutagenesis has yielded no information about residues important for antagonist binding and has identified only a few residues important for agonist binding (12-15). We recently developed a novel, potentially more effective strategy for mapping the binding sites in kinin receptors, which is based on the identification of receptor epitopes that enable these receptors to discriminate between ligands (11). This strategy involves the exchange of individual TMs between the B1 and B2 receptor subtypes and the subsequent exchange of non-conserved residues that are possible candidates for discriminatory action. This approach is intrinsically more reliable than alanine-scanning mutagenesis as it yields in sequence both loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations.In an initial study, we used this strategy to identify specific residues in TM-VI of the human WT B1 and B2 receptors that are partially responsible for enabling these receptor subtypes to discriminate between peptide agonists (11). In the present study, we analyzed the role of TM-III in peptide ligand discrimi...