2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0524-0_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR Lineshape Analysis of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Interactions

Abstract: Interactions of intrinsically disordered proteins are central to their cellular functions, and solution-state NMR spectroscopy provides a powerful tool for characterizing both structural and mechanistic aspects of such interactions. Here we focus on the analysis of IDP interactions using NMR titration measurements. Changes in resonance lineshapes in two-dimensional NMR spectra upon titration with a ligand contain rich information on structural changes in the protein and the thermodynamics and kinetics of the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conditions preclude us from considering CSPs as simple weighted averages of free and bound species, as we are no longer under fast exchange conditions (Williamson, 2013). Instead, we used TITAN 2D lineshape analysis (Waudby et al, 2016), which accounts for both CSP and peak broadening during the titration, to obtain K d values. Assuming single-site binding between UBQLN2 and each Ub unit in Ub4, we obtained binding affinities of 3 μM for both Ub and K63-Ub4, and a lower affinity of 25 μM for K48-Ub4 (Fig 2F; S1).…”
Section: Nmr and Fluorescence Anisotropy Titrations Reveal Difference...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These conditions preclude us from considering CSPs as simple weighted averages of free and bound species, as we are no longer under fast exchange conditions (Williamson, 2013). Instead, we used TITAN 2D lineshape analysis (Waudby et al, 2016), which accounts for both CSP and peak broadening during the titration, to obtain K d values. Assuming single-site binding between UBQLN2 and each Ub unit in Ub4, we obtained binding affinities of 3 μM for both Ub and K63-Ub4, and a lower affinity of 25 μM for K48-Ub4 (Fig 2F; S1).…”
Section: Nmr and Fluorescence Anisotropy Titrations Reveal Difference...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of Ub ligand were adjusted by the number of Ub units in the polyUb chain such that 50 μM Ub4 was equal to 200 μM Ub. For TITAN (Waudby et al, 2016) lineshape analysis, only SOFAST-HMQC spectra for titrations involving 15 N-labeled protein (UBQLN2 450-624) were used, following the NMR processing protocol in (Waudby & Christodoulou, 2020). TITAN software was used within NMRbox (Maciejewski et al, 2017).…”
Section: Nmr Titration Experiments and K D Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of Ub ligand were adjusted by the number of Ub units in the polyUb chain such that 50 µM Ub4 was equal to 200 µM Ub. For TITAN (Waudby et al, 2016) lineshape analysis, only SOFAST-HMQC spectra for titrations involving 15 N-labeled protein (UBQLN2 450-624) were used, following the NMR processing protocol in (Waudby and Christodoulou, 2020). For all cases, the single-site binding model (two-state ligand binding in TITAN) was used.…”
Section: Nmr Titration Experiments and Kd Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To discriminate between these two models, we carried out two-dimensional NMR line shape analysis of our NMR titration data for the variant CITED2 peptides using the program TITAN ( 25 , 26 ). A simple two-state binding model ( Scheme 1 ) is unable to reproduce the simultaneous changes in chemical shift and resonance intensity that are observed in our spectra as a function of increasing CITED2 peptide concentration ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For two-dimensional NMR line shape analysis, the 1 H- 15 N HSQC spectra were processed using exponential window functions with 4-Hz line broadening in the direct dimension and 8-Hz line broadening in the indirect dimension. The spectra were imported into TITAN ( 25 , 26 ) and analyzed using the “two-state” and “ligand exchange via ternary complex” binding models. Line shape analysis was carried out in two steps, in which the chemical shifts and line widths of the 15 N-TAZ1:HIF-1α bound state were determined first, followed by subsequent fitting of the chemical shifts and line widths of the intermediate and bound states and kinetic parameters for the binding models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%