2004
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.20024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR methods for studying membrane‐active antimicrobial peptides

Abstract: NMR is a versatile tool for studying interactions between antimicrobial peptides and lipid membranes. Different approaches using both liquid state and solid state NMR are outlined here, with an emphasis on solid state NMR methods, to study the structures of antimicrobial peptides in lipid bilayers as well as the effect of these peptides on model membranes. Different NMR techniques for observing both peptides and lipids are explained, including

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
121
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 243 publications
3
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the software predictions for the almost central residue G8 had a low consensus (and were not included in Figure 1), suggesting a flexible kink that divides the peptide sequence into two helical fragments. However, in the case of pure DPC micelles, the residue S4, which is exactly in the middle of the N-terminal fragment, was predicted to have / values not compatible with an -helix (Figure 1c), thus suggesting a regular secondary structure only for the C-terminal fragment. Figure 2 summarizes the sequential NOEs unambiguously identified for Esc (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) in the presence of either DPC or DPC/SDS micelles. Figure S1 show the H-HN region of the NOESY spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In both cases, the software predictions for the almost central residue G8 had a low consensus (and were not included in Figure 1), suggesting a flexible kink that divides the peptide sequence into two helical fragments. However, in the case of pure DPC micelles, the residue S4, which is exactly in the middle of the N-terminal fragment, was predicted to have / values not compatible with an -helix (Figure 1c), thus suggesting a regular secondary structure only for the C-terminal fragment. Figure 2 summarizes the sequential NOEs unambiguously identified for Esc (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) in the presence of either DPC or DPC/SDS micelles. Figure S1 show the H-HN region of the NOESY spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular DPC/SDS molar ratio was chosen to be close to that between zwitterionic and negatively charged lipids typical for the inner membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. 25 Table S1 reports the 1 H and 13 C resonance assignments for Esc (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) in the presence of either DPC or DPC/SDS micelles, obtained through a set of two-dimensional homo-and heteronuclear experiments, namely, DQF-COSY, TOCSY, NOESY, and HSQC. Figures 1a and 1b show the deviations of the observed chemical shifts from the reference "random coil" values for 1 H and 13 C, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations