2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1020819321506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antiproton capture and cooling can take place in either of two separate traps; the catching trap, or the mixing trap. In the former case, the cooled antiprotons are adiabatically transferred to the mixing trap after the catching and cooling [17]. The traps (inner radius 1.25 cm) are held at a temperature between 15 and 40 K. The imaging detector is kept at 140 K and housed in a separate vacuum ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The antiproton capture and cooling can take place in either of two separate traps; the catching trap, or the mixing trap. In the former case, the cooled antiprotons are adiabatically transferred to the mixing trap after the catching and cooling [17]. The traps (inner radius 1.25 cm) are held at a temperature between 15 and 40 K. The imaging detector is kept at 140 K and housed in a separate vacuum ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The squares refer to measurements with 10 8 electrons kept in the trap, whilst the circles are with less than 10 5 electrons remaining. The trapped antiprotons are counted with external annihilation detectors [17], and are normalized to the incoming antiproton number, which in turn is measured by a calibrated beam detector [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the electric trapping potential is larger than antiproton recoil energy (which should be less than few eV), antiprotons will be "born trapped". After accumulating a certain number of ionized antiprotons in the collecting well, they can be dumped onto the degrader in a usual manner [14], providing an efficient, nearly background free detection. See Fig.…”
Section: Electron Impact Ionization Of Antihydrogen Atomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Antiproton Decelerator facility located at CERN provides typically 2 10 7 antiprotons having kinetic energy of 5.3 MeVevery 100 s. They are slowed in a degrader foil and trapped dynamically using a pulsed electric field. Preloaded cold electrons in a 3 T magnetic field cool the antiprotons by Coulomb collisions from keV to meV energies [14,15]. For the measurements reported here, 10 3 to 10 4 cold antiprotons, together with 10 7 to 10 8 electrons, are held in the central trap region (the so-called mixing trap, Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the reported measurements, Note that the antiproton cyclotron frequency is 46 MHz and the radius 1:7-2:8 m in a 3 T magnetic field, and the single particle axial and magnetron frequencies for our harmonic trap are 490 and 2.6 kHz, respectively. With most of the electrons in the trap removed [21], antiproton radial transport is greatly altered and generally suppressed, making it harder to obtain annihilation images on the wall, especially for a short harmonic potential, in which the storage time exceeds 10 h [15]. Loss images could be obtained in a longer trap (length 10 cm) with the electrons removed, and they do indeed show hot spots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%