2020
DOI: 10.1177/1367549420912753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No alternatives, always more, willful optimism: New editors of the European Journal of Cultural Studies in conversation

Abstract: The following is a conversation, conducted over email in late 2019 and early 2020, between Yiu Fai Chow and Anamik Saha, the two incoming editors of European Journal of Cultural Studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of ‘European’ in the journal’s title was not so much a strong affiliation with a particular geo-political territory or identity, so much as a pragmatic signalling of the editorial team’s locatedness in the UK, the Netherlands and Finland. More recently, the desire to explicitly signal the journal’s transnational interests beyond ‘Europe’, as well as the need to bring ‘race’ much more squarely into the critical purview of cultural studies, were articulated by Anamik Saha and Yui Fai Chow upon their appointments as editors (Chow and Saha, 2020). This chimes with broader feminist, anti-racist and decolonial calls for critical cultural studies scholarship – that which moves beyond the politically foreclosing frames of single nation-states, as well as beyond hyper-specialisation within bounded topic areas – and instead which employs ‘transversal categories to connect seemingly unrelated cases’, as Radha S. Hegde (2021) puts it (p.704).…”
Section: Openness and Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of ‘European’ in the journal’s title was not so much a strong affiliation with a particular geo-political territory or identity, so much as a pragmatic signalling of the editorial team’s locatedness in the UK, the Netherlands and Finland. More recently, the desire to explicitly signal the journal’s transnational interests beyond ‘Europe’, as well as the need to bring ‘race’ much more squarely into the critical purview of cultural studies, were articulated by Anamik Saha and Yui Fai Chow upon their appointments as editors (Chow and Saha, 2020). This chimes with broader feminist, anti-racist and decolonial calls for critical cultural studies scholarship – that which moves beyond the politically foreclosing frames of single nation-states, as well as beyond hyper-specialisation within bounded topic areas – and instead which employs ‘transversal categories to connect seemingly unrelated cases’, as Radha S. Hegde (2021) puts it (p.704).…”
Section: Openness and Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is the point in any of this? Why should we care about cultural studies at all right now (see also Chow and Saha, 2020; Hage, 2020)?…”
Section: Ruining Instagrammentioning
confidence: 99%