2020
DOI: 10.1111/apa.15330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No associations between microbiota signalling substances and cognitive, language and motor development among three‐year‐old rural Ugandan children

Abstract: Child undernutrition remains a considerable problem in poor regions, due to unhygienic living conditions and chronically infected guts that make it hard to absorb nutrients. Undernutrition may negatively affect child development, 1 and findings suggest that impaired gut microbiota may be central to poor brain development. 2 However, clinical data, particularly randomised controlled trials (RCT), are

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some community-based interventions have showed significant benefits on child stunting [ 17 , 18 ], we failed to do so with our maternal education intervention, possibly due in part to prenatal influences or insults during the first 6−8 months of life [ 6 , 11 , 12 ]. Another factor linked to impaired growth has been altered gut bacterial composition in infancy [ 19 ], however, our intervention did not impact on the overall gut microbiota [ 12 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some community-based interventions have showed significant benefits on child stunting [ 17 , 18 ], we failed to do so with our maternal education intervention, possibly due in part to prenatal influences or insults during the first 6−8 months of life [ 6 , 11 , 12 ]. Another factor linked to impaired growth has been altered gut bacterial composition in infancy [ 19 ], however, our intervention did not impact on the overall gut microbiota [ 12 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resting state electroencephalography (EEG) assessments of participants were performed to investigate the impacts of MAM on brain activity. Comparisons of EEG power spectral density (PSD) between children with MAM and the well-nourished controls identi ed signi cant differences in the high-alpha (9-12 Hz), beta (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and gamma (30-45 Hz) frequency bands distributed across occipital, temporal parietal, and frontal regions (Fig. 2a & b).…”
Section: Mam Impacts Brain Activity and Expressive Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG outputs from HAPPE were then reformatted and processed using the Batch Electroencephalography Automated Processing Platform (BEAPP) 57 to extract power spectra for each participant across the following frequency bands: delta (2-4 Hz), theta (4-6 Hz), low alpha (6-9 Hz), high alpha (9-12 Hz), beta (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), and gamma (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45) and the following regions of interest (Fig. S2): occipital (E70, E71, E75, E76, E83), temporal (E36, E40, E41, E45, E46, E102, E103, E104, E108, E109), parietal (E52, E53, E59, E60, E85, E86, E91, E92), and frontal (E5, E6, E12, E13, E24, E27, E28, E33, E34, E112, E116, E117, E122, E123, E124).…”
Section: Eeg Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation