2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2009.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No correlation between time-linked plasma and CSF Aβ levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data, combined with the majority of the data from the literature, allows us to conclude that centrifugation (before or after freezing) does not affect CSF biomarker concentrations, probably not even when CSF is contaminated with blood. Although A␤ can also be found in plasma, originating from different pools such as platelets, muscle, and liver, its concentration is much lower than in CSF (23 ) and is therefore unlikely to significantly alter the concentrations measured in blood-contaminated CSF. Maximal differences of 9% and 7% for fractionated sampling and centrifugation, respectively, were smaller than the reported interassay CV for the assays used (10,17 ).…”
Section: Centrifugationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The present data, combined with the majority of the data from the literature, allows us to conclude that centrifugation (before or after freezing) does not affect CSF biomarker concentrations, probably not even when CSF is contaminated with blood. Although A␤ can also be found in plasma, originating from different pools such as platelets, muscle, and liver, its concentration is much lower than in CSF (23 ) and is therefore unlikely to significantly alter the concentrations measured in blood-contaminated CSF. Maximal differences of 9% and 7% for fractionated sampling and centrifugation, respectively, were smaller than the reported interassay CV for the assays used (10,17 ).…”
Section: Centrifugationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…11 The authors emphasized the poor reliability that arose from using multiple, discrepant assays of plasma A␤. 11 The highly variable levels of plasma A␤42 and A␤40 in different studies, 13,[31][32][33][34] and the reported lack of significant associations between levels of A␤ in plasma and CSF, 14,35 may, in part, be explained by the variability and poor reliability of assays for plasma A␤ levels, i.e., there may indeed have been an association that was obscured by the excessive variability in the results from the plasma assay. In our study, we used a single assay with established low intraclass coefficients and high test-retest reliability, 7 thereby strengthening the reliability of the plasma A␤ findings.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the fact that all the patients were taking psychotropic drugs during the ECT course may constitute a possible bias, although no influence of psychotropic medications on the plasma Aβ40/Aβ42 ratio was reported [39]. Moreover, the precise origin of plasma Aβ is not known and results regarding the relationship between peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid Aβ levels have been contradictory [57,58,59,60]. Therefore, a lack of data on cerebrospinal fluid may also be considered a limitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%