2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03124-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The usefulness of other postoperative radiographic findings as prognostic factors for failed internal fixation and cut-out is debatable. TAD ≥ 25 is recognized as the predictive factor based on consensus [ 4 , 5 ]; however, we demonstrated that the prognostic value of TAD ≥ 25 was uncertain based on the serious risk of bias and inconsistency in the results from the included studies. Moreover, other postoperative radiographic findings had a serious risk of bias and concerns about publication bias or imprecision, which had not been sufficiently assessed in earlier reviews [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The usefulness of other postoperative radiographic findings as prognostic factors for failed internal fixation and cut-out is debatable. TAD ≥ 25 is recognized as the predictive factor based on consensus [ 4 , 5 ]; however, we demonstrated that the prognostic value of TAD ≥ 25 was uncertain based on the serious risk of bias and inconsistency in the results from the included studies. Moreover, other postoperative radiographic findings had a serious risk of bias and concerns about publication bias or imprecision, which had not been sufficiently assessed in earlier reviews [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…TAD ≥ 25 is recognized as the predictive factor based on consensus [ 4 , 5 ]; however, we demonstrated that the prognostic value of TAD ≥ 25 was uncertain based on the serious risk of bias and inconsistency in the results from the included studies. Moreover, other postoperative radiographic findings had a serious risk of bias and concerns about publication bias or imprecision, which had not been sufficiently assessed in earlier reviews [ 4 , 5 ]. Hence, routine assessment of these postoperative radiographic findings may be unnecessary because of lack of evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations