No Difference in Bone Tunnel Enlargement and Clinical Outcome between Cortical Suspension and Hybrid Femoral Fixation in Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract

ObjectiveThe best method for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial. The study assesses the bone tunnel enlargement and clinical outcome in hamstring ACLR using cortical suspension or hybrid (cortical suspension and compression) femoral fixation.MethodsFrom January 2010 to December 2021, 102 patients who underwent quadruple hamstring ACLR using cortical suspension (39 patients) or hybrid (63 patients) fixation on the femoral side were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical evaluation was conducted using the international knee documentation committee score, the Lysholm score, the Tegner activity level scale, the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (quality of life score), the Lachman test, and the side‐to‐side difference by the KT‐1000 arthrometer. The complications after the surgery were also evaluated. These data were compared at baseline and last follow‐up. The diameters of the femoral tunnel were calculated at three sites: the width of the entrance of the femoral tunnel, 1 cm proximal to the entrance of the femoral tunnel and the largest diameter of the femoral tunnel on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coronal images. Bone tunnel widening data were contrasted between MRI images conducted at least 2 years and within 2 weeks after surgery. The morphology of bone tunnel enlargement was also observed and recorded. The categorical parameters were analyzed using the χ2‐test and Fisher's exact test. The continuous variables conforming to a normal distribution were analyzed using Student's t‐test, and the Mann–Whitney U‐test was undertaken between the two groups without normal distribution.ResultsBoth cortical suspension and hybrid femoral fixation in quadruple hamstring ACLR achieved significantly improved patient‐reported outcome scores and knee stability compared to preoperative data. However, no significant differences were found between these two methods in clinical evaluations, postoperative complications, and patient‐reported outcome scores. Although the mean diameter of the enlarged bone tunnel was lowered by an additional bioabsorbable interference screw fixation near the joint line, a statistically insignificant difference was found between the hybrid and cortical suspension fixation on the femoral side. There was no statistical difference in the distribution of enlarged bone tunnel morphology between groups.ConclusionsNo significant difference was found in the bone tunnel enlargement and clinical outcome between cortical suspension and hybrid femoral fixation in ACLR using hamstring autograft.