2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2149099/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-Dose Photodynamic Therapy Against half-dose Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Abstract: Objective To describe the effects of no-dose full fluence photodynamic therapy without verteporfin (no-dose PDT) and to compare no-dose PDT with half-dose verteporfin full-fluence photodynamic therapy (HDFF PDT) for managing chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC). Methods This retrospective study evaluated 11 patients with chronic recurrent CSC treated with no-dose PDT between January 2019 and March 2022. Most of these patients were also treated with half-dose full-fluence PDT (HDFF PDT) a minimum o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research could reveal alternative photosensitizers suited for treating chorioretinal diseases. Sparked by the verteporfin shortage, a study has appeared testing the efficacy of "no-dose" PDT in CSC [42]. In this case, the same laser treatment is used in the eye as with regular PDT, but without the use of any photosensitizer.…”
Section: New Treatment Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research could reveal alternative photosensitizers suited for treating chorioretinal diseases. Sparked by the verteporfin shortage, a study has appeared testing the efficacy of "no-dose" PDT in CSC [42]. In this case, the same laser treatment is used in the eye as with regular PDT, but without the use of any photosensitizer.…”
Section: New Treatment Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Servillo et al treated 15 eyes with CSCR lasting at least 12 weeks with no-dose PDT (50 J/cm 2 fluence, 83 s exposure time) using a 689 nm laser [125]. The results were compared with a control group of CSCR patients treated with hd-PDT.…”
Section: Nm Laser Without Verteporfinmentioning
confidence: 99%