2006
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00491.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No effect of menstrual cycle phase on glycerol or palmitate kinetics during 90 min of moderate exercise

Abstract: No effect of menstrual cycle phase on glycerol or palmitate kinetics during 90 min of moderate exercise. J Appl Physiol 100: 917-925, 2006; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00491.2005.-The systemic flux of glycerol and palmitate [a representative nonesterified free fatty acid (NEFA)] was assessed in three different phases of the menstrual cycle at rest and during moderate-intensity exercise. It was hypothesized that circulating glycerol and NEFA turnover would be greatest in the midfollicular (MF) phase of the menstr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(112 reference statements)
1
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that plasma FFA concentration and R a were not different between FP and LP is consistent with previous reports on the effect of menstrual cycle phase on basal, postabsorptive plasma FFA concentration and FFA R a (20,24). It is unlikely that this consistent lack of difference was due to insufficient statistical power of the studies or the variation in sex hormone concentrations within each cycle phase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our finding that plasma FFA concentration and R a were not different between FP and LP is consistent with previous reports on the effect of menstrual cycle phase on basal, postabsorptive plasma FFA concentration and FFA R a (20,24). It is unlikely that this consistent lack of difference was due to insufficient statistical power of the studies or the variation in sex hormone concentrations within each cycle phase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The finding in the present study that the RER was not different in either phase of the menstrual cycle contrasts with studies of more prolonged exercise which report that females preferentially utilize fat as a fuel source during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (Bonen et al 1983;Dombovy et al 1987;Hackney et al 1994;Hackney 1999;Zderic et al 2001;, although others report no differences in RER between phases of the menstrual cycle (Braun et al 2000;Horton et al 2002Horton et al , 2006. In the present study, RER was measured during the first 6 min of exercise, whereas in previous studies measurements were made later in exercise (>10 min) where an effect of menstrual cycle phase on substrate utilization has been observed (Braun et al 2000;Zderic et al 2001;.…”
Section: _ Vo 2 Kineticscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Although data is limited, there is so far no evidence that menstrual cycle phase affects basal postabsorptive FFA kinetics [4648,97,98] or meal fatty acid disposal [99]. The effect of sex hormones on insulin-mediated suppression of lipolysis has to our knowledge not been studied in vivo in human subjects.…”
Section: Sex Differences In the Control Of Adipose Tissue Lipolysis Bmentioning
confidence: 99%