No Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Auditory-Evoked Potentials

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique to change cortical excitability. Its effects are shown for cognitive processing, and behavior in the motor and perceptual domains. However, evidence of tDCS effects in the perceptual domain particularly for auditory processing is rare. Therefore, and in the context of disturbances in auditory processing in psychiatric populations, e.g., in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations, we aimed to investigate the potential modulatory effect of tDCS on the excitability of left posterior temporal cortex in detail. We included 24 healthy participants in a crossover design, applying sham and anodal stimulation in two measurement sessions 1 week apart. Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded while participants listened to tones before, during, and after stimulation. Amplitudes and latencies of P50, N100, and P200 auditory-evoked potentials (AEP) were compared between anodal and sham stimulation, and between time points before, during, and after tDCS. In contrast to previous studies, results demonstrate no significant differences between stimulation types or time points for any of the investigated AEP amplitudes or latencies. Furthermore, a topographical analysis did not show any topographical differences during peak time periods of the investigated AEP for stimulation types and time points besides a habituation effect. Thus, our results suggest that tDCS modulation of excitability of the left posterior temporal cortex, targeting the auditory cortex, does not have any effect on AEP. This is particularly interesting in the context of tDCS as a potential treatment for changed electrophysiological parameters and symptoms of psychiatric diseases, e.g., lower N100 or auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia.

Editorial. Probing the tract organization of language: Heschl’s gyrus fiber intersection area

“…Myriad investigations of Heschl's gyrus have been carried out related to many aspects of auditory processing, including developmental maturation, 15 normal auditory processing, 10 disorders of auditory processing such as autism, 18 pitch processing in musicians, 20 and auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia, 2 among many others. A number of techniques have been used to examine the auditory cortex, including transcranial direct current stimulation, 11 PET, 13 magnetoencephalography, 9 and functional MRI (fMRI). 16 Techniques used to analyze white matter within and in contact with the auditory cortex, such as volumetric morphometry, 17 electron microscopy, 1 and diffusion MRI, 6 often reveal an asymmetry between the 2 hemispheres, which is hypothesized to be related to language lateralization.…”

TMEM16F/Anoctamin 6 in Ferroptotic Cell Death

“…TMEM16A is overexpressed in a subset of malignomas where it drives cellular dedifferentiation, cell proliferation and thus supports growth of cancer cells [5]. A number of cellular signaling molecules appear to contribute to this pro-proliferative effect, however, TMEM16A-induced filling of the ER Ca 2+ store and enhanced cytosolic Ca 2+ signaling, appear to be major factors.…”

“…These proteins are broadly expressed and fulfill numerous functions in epithelial cells and other non-excitable tissues, as well neurons, smooth muscles and sensory cells. The Ca 2+ activated Cl − channel TMEM16A has been analyzed in great detail, and has been found along with other members of the TMEM16 family to control cell proliferation and growth of different types of cancer (reviewed in [4,5]. Thus, inhibition of TMEM16A is a novel way to interfere with cell proliferation and growth of cancer [5,6,7,8,9].…”

Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Human Auditory Processing and Behavior—A Review

“…Furthermore, compared to the experimental scheme of Zaehle et al [ 25 ], Kunzelmann et al investigated the potential effect of tDCS on the excitability of the left posterior temporal cortex [ 35 ]. All subjects were randomized to receive anodal stimulation/sham stimulation.…”