2011
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31820d94d0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Effects of Anti-Motion Sickness Drugs on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials Outcome Parameters

Abstract: The absence of clinically significant effects can be explained by the predominant presence of the target receptors for the applied drugs in the medial vestibular nucleus, which receives the lowest grade of saccular projections. It also can be hypothesized that the VEMP methodology and techniques in general do not allow determining pharmacologic effects in a healthy group of subjects because of a too small discriminative power. The left-right asymmetry can be explained by a depressive action of the drugs on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is perhaps not surprising given the ability to right per se is not dependent on the SC, only the ability to modulate righting by height is. Rather the vestibular system is responsible for overall righting [39] and there is evidence that amphetamine does not impact on this system [56]. In addition, there was no alteration to the plane in which righting occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is perhaps not surprising given the ability to right per se is not dependent on the SC, only the ability to modulate righting by height is. Rather the vestibular system is responsible for overall righting [39] and there is evidence that amphetamine does not impact on this system [56]. In addition, there was no alteration to the plane in which righting occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, we evaluated saccular function by performing c-VEMP testing. Details on the procedure have been published previously (Colebatch et al, 1994; Vanspauwen et al, 2011). In brief, a patient’s saccular function is quantified by the response of the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle to air-conducted 500 Hz tone bursts delivered monoaurally via insert phones.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, saccular function was evaluated by performing c-VEMP testing. Details on the procedure have been published previously [18,19]. In brief, a patient's saccular function was quantified by the response of the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle to air-conducted 500 Hz tone bursts delivered monoaurally via insert phones.…”
Section: Vestibular Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%