2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence for effects of Turkish immigrant children‘s bilingualism on executive functions

Abstract: Recent research has increasingly questioned the bilingual advantage for executive functions (EF). We used structural equation modeling in a large sample of Turkish immigrant and German monolingual children (N = 337; aged 5–15 years) to test associations between bilingualism and EF. Our data showed no significant group differences between Turkish immigrant and German children’s EF skills while taking into account maternal education, child gender, age, and working memory (i.e., digit span backwards). Moreover, n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Eighteen studies (Danahy et al, 2007 ; Bialystok and Feng, 2009 ; Bialystok and Viswanathan, 2009 ; Bialystok, 2010 ; Engel de Abreu, 2011 ; Kapa and Colombo, 2013 ; Blom et al, 2014 , 2017 ; Engel de Abreu et al, 2014 ; Filippi et al, 2015 ; Garraffa et al, 2015 ; Buac et al, 2016 ; Cockcroft, 2016 ; Bosman and Janssen, 2017 ; Raudszus et al, 2018 ; Veenstra et al, 2018 ; Hartanto et al, 2019 ; Jaekel et al, 2019 ) evaluated working memory by using different versions of the digit span task. In 12 studies (Danahy et al, 2007 ; Bialystok and Feng, 2009 ; Bialystok and Viswanathan, 2009 ; Engel de Abreu, 2011 ; Kapa and Colombo, 2013 ; Engel de Abreu et al, 2014 ; Filippi et al, 2015 ; Garraffa et al, 2015 ; Cockcroft, 2016 ; Blom et al, 2017 ; Raudszus et al, 2018 ; Veenstra et al, 2018 ) no significant differences between the two groups emerged.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Eighteen studies (Danahy et al, 2007 ; Bialystok and Feng, 2009 ; Bialystok and Viswanathan, 2009 ; Bialystok, 2010 ; Engel de Abreu, 2011 ; Kapa and Colombo, 2013 ; Blom et al, 2014 , 2017 ; Engel de Abreu et al, 2014 ; Filippi et al, 2015 ; Garraffa et al, 2015 ; Buac et al, 2016 ; Cockcroft, 2016 ; Bosman and Janssen, 2017 ; Raudszus et al, 2018 ; Veenstra et al, 2018 ; Hartanto et al, 2019 ; Jaekel et al, 2019 ) evaluated working memory by using different versions of the digit span task. In 12 studies (Danahy et al, 2007 ; Bialystok and Feng, 2009 ; Bialystok and Viswanathan, 2009 ; Engel de Abreu, 2011 ; Kapa and Colombo, 2013 ; Engel de Abreu et al, 2014 ; Filippi et al, 2015 ; Garraffa et al, 2015 ; Cockcroft, 2016 ; Blom et al, 2017 ; Raudszus et al, 2018 ; Veenstra et al, 2018 ) no significant differences between the two groups emerged.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 12 studies (Danahy et al, 2007 ; Bialystok and Feng, 2009 ; Bialystok and Viswanathan, 2009 ; Engel de Abreu, 2011 ; Kapa and Colombo, 2013 ; Engel de Abreu et al, 2014 ; Filippi et al, 2015 ; Garraffa et al, 2015 ; Cockcroft, 2016 ; Blom et al, 2017 ; Raudszus et al, 2018 ; Veenstra et al, 2018 ) no significant differences between the two groups emerged. In three studies, monolinguals remembered a significantly higher number of digits than bilinguals in the forward digit span task (Buac et al, 2016 ; Bosman and Janssen, 2017 ) and backward digit span (Jaekel et al, 2019 ). In Bialystok ( 2010 ), which reported three studies involving three different groups of participants, bilinguals' scores were lower than monolinguals' scores only in the third study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across different measurements of executive control, no consistent differences were observed between the active and inactive bilingual language users [23], although language use did affect lexical processing [24]. Other studies have furthermore assessed effects of language use by using a proportion of daily non-L1 usage (e.g., [15]), the amount of a language spoken at home (e.g., [25]), or the amount of language use across different interactional contexts (e.g., [26]).…”
Section: Individual Differences In Bilingualismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Appel and Muysken (2005) claim, bilingualism occurs in all societies but the form and the degree of it may vary. Jaekel et al (2019) draw our attention to the benefits of speaking two or more languages. A development of two language systems simultaneously or successively enable bilinguals to use both systems actively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%