To the Editors:In an article published in a recent issue of the European Respiratory Journal, DEHNERT et al.[1] report various measurements made after climbing at high altitude. Among them were carbon monoxide (CO) transfer measurements. I was surprised by the finding of an increase in the transfer factor of the lung for CO (TL,CO) at altitude, as an article presently in press [2], already published in abstract form [3], in which TL,CO and the transfer factor of the lung for nitric oxide (TL,NO) decreased slightly but significantly at altitude. At 5,000 m, two thirds of the subjects decreased their TL,NO by .5% after a short maximal exercise. This discrepancy could be due to the fact that DEHNERT et al.[1] divided the measured value at altitude by a factor ,1 which, in fact, should only be used to estimate the predicted values at altitude. Altitude hypoxia, due to reduced capillary oxygen pressure, increases the conductance of blood for CO and, therefore, the CO transfer. Thus, if one wants to compare the results obtained at altitude to those at sea level, we should either multiply the measured results by this factor or express the results as % predicted, taking into account the equation cited in DEHNERT et al.[1] for the predicted value at altitude. When looking for a detection of interstitial oedema, NO transfer would be more sensitive than CO, as the former is mainly dependent on the membrane conductance and the latter is dependent on both membrane and blood conductances [4]. [1] observed a small but significant decrease in TL,CO in acclimatised subjects after maximal exercise at 5,000 m, which H. Guénard considers to be in disagreement with the small increase we found in nonacclimatised subjects at rest at 4,559 m. He suggests that the discrepancy is due to an erroneous calculation of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL,CO) on our part. Furthermore, he points out that transfer factor of the lung for nitric oxide (TL,NO), which was also slightly decreased in the study of DE BISSCHOP et al.
H. Guénard[1], is a better measure of diffusion than TL,CO, since nitric oxide uptake is dependent only on membrane conductance and is not influenced by blood conductance.First, we need to emphasise that corrections of the DL,CO measurements for altitude were done properly. The equipment used in the study performed an automated correction of DL,CO for the lower oxygen tension at altitude according to the formula given by MACINTYRE et al. where DL,CO and DL,CO,Alt are the measured single-breath DL,CO at low altitude and that predicted for altitude, respectively, PI,O 2 ,Alt is the inspiratory oxygen tension (PI,O 2 ) at altitude, and 150 mmHg is the assumed at sea level.As pointed out by H. Guénard, this formula predicts DL,CO at high altitude based on measurements performed at low altitude. Since our values measured at high altitude were compared with the baseline values at low altitude, the automated correction multiplied the measured values by (1+0.00316(PI,O 2 -150)), i.e. by a term that is less than o...