2022
DOI: 10.1111/evo.14429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence for the evolution of mating behavior in spider mites due toWolbachia‐induced cytoplasmic incompatibility

Abstract: Arthropods are often infected with Wolbachia inducing cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), whereby crosses between uninfected females and infected males yield unviable fertilized offspring. Although uninfected females benefit from avoiding mating withWolbachia-infected males, this behavior is not always present in host populations and its evolution may hinge upon various factors.Here, we used spider mites to test whether CI could select for mate preference in uninfected females in absence of kin recognition.We fo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, the procedure used to create these two populations was as follows. Both populations originated from the same five population replicates (the ‘iC’ populations in Rodrigues et al, 2022), themselves formed by merging six Wolbachia ‐infected, homozygous etoxazole‐susceptible, populations collected in the region of Lisbon, Portugal, in 2013 (Zélé, Santos, Olivieri, et al, 2018). Five etoxazole‐resistant population replicates were then created by performing eight generations of backcross between each of the susceptible population replicates, and a homozygous etoxazole‐resistant paternal line SB9.Rif (originally collected in Crete, Greece, in 2006; van Leeuwen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the procedure used to create these two populations was as follows. Both populations originated from the same five population replicates (the ‘iC’ populations in Rodrigues et al, 2022), themselves formed by merging six Wolbachia ‐infected, homozygous etoxazole‐susceptible, populations collected in the region of Lisbon, Portugal, in 2013 (Zélé, Santos, Olivieri, et al, 2018). Five etoxazole‐resistant population replicates were then created by performing eight generations of backcross between each of the susceptible population replicates, and a homozygous etoxazole‐resistant paternal line SB9.Rif (originally collected in Crete, Greece, in 2006; van Leeuwen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the procedure used to create these two populations was as follows. Both populations originated from the same five population replicates (the ‘iC’ populations in Rodrigues et al, 2022), themselves formed by merging six Wolbachia-infected , homozygous etoxazole-susceptible, populations collected in the region of Lisbon, Portugal, in 2013 (Zélé et al, 2018). Five etoxazole-resistant population replicates were then created by performing eight generations of backcross between each of the susceptible population replicates, and a homozygous etoxazole-resistant paternal line SB9.Rif (originally collected in Crete, Greece, in 2006; van Leeuwen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each population replicate was initially created with a census population size of 200 mated females and subsequently maintained with discrete generations at this same population size (cf. detailed procedure for the creation and maintenance of these populations, called "Infected controls; iC", in Rodrigues et al 2022a). Full homozygosity for the etoxazole susceptible allele was subsequently con rmed by PCR-RFLP (as described in Van Leeuwen et al 2012) for each of the eld-derived populations and each of the Wi.SS replicates.…”
Section: Creation Of the Wiss Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%