2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0162-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence for widespread bird declines in protected South American forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed the lowest proportion of diet specialists in old-growth forest. This finding is counterintuitive, yet consistent with previous reports showing a higher proportion of generalists in old-growth forests than in successional forests (Boyle and Sigel 2015; Bradfer-Lawrence et al 2018; Powell et al 2013; Stouffer et al 2011). This result too may be related to differential occupancy of old growth and successional habitats by migrants and residents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We also observed the lowest proportion of diet specialists in old-growth forest. This finding is counterintuitive, yet consistent with previous reports showing a higher proportion of generalists in old-growth forests than in successional forests (Boyle and Sigel 2015; Bradfer-Lawrence et al 2018; Powell et al 2013; Stouffer et al 2011). This result too may be related to differential occupancy of old growth and successional habitats by migrants and residents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For this reason, when I wrote the paper about the problem that apparently affects forest birds in South America (Nores 2009), I hoped that some researcher would show me that the problem is, at least, not so important as to have a significant impact on bird conservation. So, when I saw a group of 13 researchers from different countries (despite several of them not having experience in tropical forest birds) claim that there is no evidence for widespread bird decline in protected South American forests (Stouffer et al 2011); I saw this as a positive contribution. However, after reading the commentary, I am afraid that their arguments are insufficient to show that the problem may not be a threat to bird survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%