2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0867-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence of chromosome damage in children and adolescents with differentiated thyroid carcinoma after receiving 131I radiometabolic therapy, as evaluated by micronucleus assay and microarray analysis

Abstract: We demonstrated for the first time that peripheral cells of DTC children and adolescents who received (131)I at a mean dosage of 3.50 +/- 0.37 GBq did not show chromosome damage within 48 h from the end of radiometabolic therapy. This may be due to a prompt activation of the cell machinery that maintains the integrity of the genome to prevent harmful double-strand breaks from progressing to chromosome mutations, either by repairing the lesions or by eliminating the most seriously damaged cells via apoptosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dose-dependent results were also found by Gutiérrez et al (1997) MN, which is a small nuclear mass that is surrounded by membrane and separated from the main nucleus, can be derived from chromatid or chromosome breaks (Fenech, 2000); although Saffi and Henriques (2003) argue that chromatid/chromosome breaks are the main type of radiation-induced DNA damage, MN may also result from single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, base and sugar damage, and oxidative damage to bases between protein-DNA and DNA-DNA interchange bridges. Federico et al (2008) reported negative results for the MN test using blood from 11 patients who received an average of 94,594.59 ± 10,000 μCi [ 131 I] for ablation of thyroidal remnants. According to the authors, this may be due to an early activation of cellular repair machinery that maintains the integrity of the genome and may prevent double-strand DNA breaks from progressing to chromosomal mutations by either repairing the lesions or by eliminating the damaged cells via apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dose-dependent results were also found by Gutiérrez et al (1997) MN, which is a small nuclear mass that is surrounded by membrane and separated from the main nucleus, can be derived from chromatid or chromosome breaks (Fenech, 2000); although Saffi and Henriques (2003) argue that chromatid/chromosome breaks are the main type of radiation-induced DNA damage, MN may also result from single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, base and sugar damage, and oxidative damage to bases between protein-DNA and DNA-DNA interchange bridges. Federico et al (2008) reported negative results for the MN test using blood from 11 patients who received an average of 94,594.59 ± 10,000 μCi [ 131 I] for ablation of thyroidal remnants. According to the authors, this may be due to an early activation of cellular repair machinery that maintains the integrity of the genome and may prevent double-strand DNA breaks from progressing to chromosomal mutations by either repairing the lesions or by eliminating the damaged cells via apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be stressed that the maximum mean MN value obtained by us (2.45Ϯ0.22‰) falls into the expected range for healthy children and adolescents. In fact, several studies have reported baseline frequencies of underage subjects as generally oscillating from 1.6 to 8.3‰ (33,(37)(38)(39)(40). It probably depends on the experimental procedure used, which may vary from laboratory to laboratory (different modality of cell culturing, harvesting, and staining, different scoring criteria, variation in the numbers of readers, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some studies have demonstrated that patients who received 131 I did not exhibit chromosomal damage from radiometabolic therapy (Gil et al 2000b;Federico et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The chromosomal damage induced by radioiodine exposure predisposes individuals to a future risk of developing cancer (Federico et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%