1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00410.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence of cross‐reaction between fepradinol and other phenylethanolamines

Abstract: We are not aware of previous descriptions of such a severe chemical burn by acetic acid, requiring skin grafting, as in this case. A previous description of a superficial chemical burn on the face from the use of vinegar was found in a case of pediculosis capitis (2).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…or eth. Goday et al (11) achieved better results at 2% eth. In children, Gomez (10) recommended patch testing initially with 0.1% pet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…or eth. Goday et al (11) achieved better results at 2% eth. In children, Gomez (10) recommended patch testing initially with 0.1% pet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since 1992, when Izu et al (6) described the first 2 cases of allergic contact dermatitis from fepradinol, a total of 11 cases have been reported, summarized in Table 1 (7–12). Most cases presented with an eczematous eruption, one with a photoallergic contact dermatitis (12) and none with purpuric or papulonecrotic lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%