2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-9070-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) and disability improvement after alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: a 36-month real-world study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
37
3
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
37
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of multiple sclerosis (MS), there is a growing interest in the use of real-world data to evaluate outcomes of drug treatments [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Some disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS have proven their efficacy in randomized clinical trial (RCT) but were not always equally effective for patients in real-world clinical practice [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of multiple sclerosis (MS), there is a growing interest in the use of real-world data to evaluate outcomes of drug treatments [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Some disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS have proven their efficacy in randomized clinical trial (RCT) but were not always equally effective for patients in real-world clinical practice [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alemtuzumab is an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody that depletes and repopulates circulating T and B lymphocytes, thereby shifting cytokine expression toward a less-inflammatory condition 1. Alemtuzumab was shown to be a highly efficacious therapy with tolerable safety in previous studies—including clinical trials—that mainly involved Western patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) 234567891011. The prevalence of MS is much higher in Western populations than in Asian populations, and various disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS have been approved later in Asian countries than in Western countries 1213.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement was defined as a decrease in EDSS score from baseline of at least 1 point for baseline EDSS < 5.5 or of at least 0.5 points for baseline EDSS ⩾ 5.5, confirmed at 6 months or more. 2,3 The first visit when the improvement is reached was defined as the time to improvement start. The time to improvement stop was defined as the time between baseline and the time when EDSS returned to a value equal to or higher than the baseline value (or to a value not qualifying for the improvement definition), confirmed for 6 months or more.…”
Section: Improvement Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%