2023
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20085522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Excess of Mortality from Lung Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic in an Area at Environmental Risk: Results of an Explorative Analysis

Abstract: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and the restrictive measures associated with it placed enormous pressure on health facilities and may have caused delays in the treatment of other diseases, leading to increases in mortality compared to the expected rates. Areas with high levels of air pollution already have a high risk of death from cancer, so we aimed to evaluate the possible indirect effects of the pandemic on mortality from lung cancer compared to the pre-pandemic period in the province of Taranto, a pollu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This crude comparison suffers from several pitfalls, as shown for example by Kepp et al [ 29 ], in contrast to the interpolation performed in our analysis, as discussed in Faisant et al [ 10 ]. Moreover, unlike traditional statistical methods such as time series modelling [ 30 ], quantile regression interpolates the distribution of quantiles during and in the absence of lockdown giving the background estimate rather than just forecasting estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This crude comparison suffers from several pitfalls, as shown for example by Kepp et al [ 29 ], in contrast to the interpolation performed in our analysis, as discussed in Faisant et al [ 10 ]. Moreover, unlike traditional statistical methods such as time series modelling [ 30 ], quantile regression interpolates the distribution of quantiles during and in the absence of lockdown giving the background estimate rather than just forecasting estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%