2020
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/132/24001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No feedback is possible in a small-scale turbulent magnetic field

Abstract: Evolution of a stochastically homogeneous magnetic field advected by an incompressible turbulent flow with large magnetic Prandtl numbers is considered at scales smaller than the Kolmogorov viscous scale. It is shown that, despite the unlimited growth of the magnetic field, its feedback on the fluid's dynamics remains negligibly small.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, the theoretical analysis and numerical simulation confirm that, as µ → ∞, the increment γ(µ, F ) converges to the value γ(F ) found for the Batchelor regime. This is also not trivial: for instance, this equality does not hold for two-dimensional flows (Kolokolov 2017;Schekochihin et al 2002a) or for higher-order correlators in three-dimensional flows (Zybin et al 2020). The Kazantsev equation corresponds to the infinitetime limit; the convergence of the solutions in the limit P r m → ∞ (and its coincidence with the value obtained for the Batchelor case) means that the limits P r m → ∞ and t → ∞ commutate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, the theoretical analysis and numerical simulation confirm that, as µ → ∞, the increment γ(µ, F ) converges to the value γ(F ) found for the Batchelor regime. This is also not trivial: for instance, this equality does not hold for two-dimensional flows (Kolokolov 2017;Schekochihin et al 2002a) or for higher-order correlators in three-dimensional flows (Zybin et al 2020). The Kazantsev equation corresponds to the infinitetime limit; the convergence of the solutions in the limit P r m → ∞ (and its coincidence with the value obtained for the Batchelor case) means that the limits P r m → ∞ and t → ∞ commutate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%